PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 105 granted patents across 50 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B60W (Conjoint Control OF Vehicle Sub-units OF Different Type OR Different FUNCTION; Control Systems Specially Adapted FOR Hybrid VEHICLES; Road Vehicle Drive Control Systems FOR Purposes NOT Related TO THE).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Guangzhou ranks #3,496 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 105 patents across 50 technology areas.

#3,496
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 3%
by Innovation Score (60.3/100)
12.7
avg claims per patent
+1700%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R3496 · Foreign Corporation #3,496 · 105 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-STRONG · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MID 105 grants
  • TOP-DECILE #3,496/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Dionex
  • CPC-WIDE B60W · 50 areas
  • INNOV-STRONG 60.3/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 12.7 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-SURGE +1700% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Dionex Corporation (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Guangzhou’s 60.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Guangzhou

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Guangzhou's Innovation Score is 60.3/100 (top 3% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Guangzhou?

Each dot is one of Guangzhou’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Guangzhou’s own 12.7 claims/patent is at or below the 13.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Guangzhou vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 104.9105.0105.0105105.0105.0105.1 510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Dionex Corporation - 105, 15.3DionexFiskars Brands, Inc. - 105, 6.7Fiskars BrandsGenband US LLC - 105, 20.05Genband USGreat Wall Motor Company Limited - 105, 12.99Great Wall MotorHCT Group Holdings Limited - 105, 7.66HCT Group HoldingsHewlett-Packard Indigo B.V. - 105, 16.12Hewlett-packard I…Hyundai Kefico Corporation - 105, 10.48Hyundai KeficoImperva, Inc. - 105, 20.86ImpervaGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. - 105, 12.71Guangzhou Automob…
Guangzhou vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

How Guangzhou's grant cadence moved

Between 2020–2024, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. received 90 grants versus 5 in 2015–2019 (+1700% equal-window velocity, top decile growth). Across complete PatentsView years, output peaked in 2022 at 23 grants and bottomed in 2017 at 1. Lead class B60W accounts for 31.4% of the portfolio across 50 subclasses. Volume neighbours: Dionex Corporation (#3,492) and Imperva, Inc. (#3,500).

Guangzhou's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. moved from 34 to 59 grants (1.74x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #301. See the growth leaderboard.

Who files at Guangzhou's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Guangzhou holds 105 patents at rank #3,496, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Guangzhou

By rank, the assignees closest to #3,496 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B60W (Conjoint Control OF Vehicle Sub-units OF Different Type O…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Guangzhou's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Guangzhou, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In B60W (Conjoint Control OF Vehicle Sub-units OF Different Type O…), Guangzhou ranks #114 of 1,122 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (60 here).

Avalara, Inc. 60 Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd. 60 University OF Wyoming 60 Khalifa University of Science and Technology 60

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (12.7 here).

Unirac, Inc. 12.7 avg Casale SA 12.7 avg Sigmastar Technology Ltd. 12.7 avg Dexerials Corporation 12.7 avg

Guangzhou's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

60 Top 3% higher than 97% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0510152025 201720182019202020212022202320242025 10
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2017 1 1.0%
2018 1 1.0%
2019 3 2.9%
2020 19 18.1%
2021 12 11.4%
2022 23 21.9%
2023 17 16.2%
2024 19 18.1%
2025partial year 10 9.5%

Which technologies does Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. patent most?

Top 15 of 50 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is B60W (Conjoint Control OF Vehicle Sub-units OF Different Type OR Different FUNCTION; Control Systems Specially Adapted FOR Hybrid VEHICLES; Road Vehicle Drive Control Systems FOR Purposes NOT Related TO THE), 31.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B60W
  • Ranked #3,496 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. against Dionex Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 60.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.