Where does Fiskars Brands, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Fiskars Brands, Inc. ranks #3,493 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Fiskars Brands, Inc. hold?

Fiskars Brands, Inc. holds 105 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 25 technology areas.

What is Fiskars Brands, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Fiskars Brands, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 43.0 out of 100 (top 29% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Fiskars Brands, Inc. focus on?

Fiskars Brands, Inc.'s top technology area is B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR) with 21 patents, ranking #13 of 239 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 25 CPC subclasses total.

Is Fiskars Brands, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Fiskars Brands, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -78% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Fiskars Brands, Inc.'s patents?

Fiskars Brands, Inc.'s patents average 6.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Fiskars Brands, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Fiskars Brands, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 105 granted patents across 25 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Fiskars ranks #3,493 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 105 patents across 25 technology areas.

#3,493
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 29%
by Innovation Score (43.0/100): 6.7
avg claims per patent: -78%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R3493 · US Corporation #3,493 · 105 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MID 105 grants
TOP-DECILE #3,493/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH 24M
CPC-FOCUS B26B · 25 areas
INNOV-PAR 43.0/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.7 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -78% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: 24M Technologies, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Fiskars’s 43.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 16.1 pts (37%) Velocity 5.2 pts (12%) Breadth 17.7 pts (41%) Claim depth 4.0 pts (9%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Ferric · near

43
Fiskars Brands · this assignee

43
Kennedy Valve · near

43
Silicon Integrated… · near

43
Ward-Kraft · near

43
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Fiskars's Innovation Score is 43.0/100 (top 29% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Fiskars?

Each dot is one of Fiskars’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Fiskars’s own 6.7 claims/patent is at or below the 13.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Fiskars vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Fiskars's grants concentrate

Fiskars Brands, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 25 CPC subclasses with 20% of grants classified under B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (24 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2021. By volume, Fiskars sits between ZF Active Safety GmbH and HCT Group Holdings Limited.

Fiskars's three-year grant acceleration

Fiskars Brands, Inc. shows 14 grants in 2022–2024 against only 18 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

ZF Active Safety

106
24M

105
Beijing Kingsoft…

105
Dionex

105
Genband US

105
Great Wall Motor

105
Guangzhou Automob…

105
HCT Group Holdings

105
Fiskars Brands ◀

105

What this shows Fiskars holds 105 patents at rank #3,493, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Fiskars

By rank, the assignees closest to #3,493 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Fiskars's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Fiskars, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools), Fiskars ranks #13 of 239 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (43 here).

Kennedy Valve Company 43 Ferric Inc. 43 Ward-Kraft, Inc. 43 Silicon Integrated Systems Corp. 43

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (6.7 here).

Daimler Truck AG 6.7 avg Tadano Ltd. 6.7 avg Shiroki Corporation 6.7 avg GN Audio A/S 6.7 avg

Fiskars's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

43 Top 29% higher than 71% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Fiskars Brands, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	16	15.2%
2016	24	22.9%
2017	20	19.0%
2018	12	11.4%
2019	13	12.4%
2020	3	2.9%
2021	2	1.9%
2022	5	4.8%
2023	4	3.8%
2024	5	4.8%
2025partial year	1	1.0%

Which technologies does Fiskars Brands, Inc. patent most?

B26B - Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 21

B25F - Combination OR Multi-purpose Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Details OR Components OF Portable Power-driven Tools NOT Particularly Related TO THE Operations Performed AND NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 11

B25B - Tools OR Bench Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR, FOR Fastening, Connecting, Disengaging OR Holding 8

A45F - Travelling OR Camp EQUIPMENT: Sacks OR Packs Carried ON THE Body 6

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 5

A01K - Animal HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; Rearing OR Breeding Animals, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; NEW Breeds OF Animals 4

B23D - PLANING; SLOTTING; SHEARING; BROACHING; SAWING; FILING; SCRAPING; Like Operations FOR Working Metal BY Removing Material, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 3

A01G - HORTICULTURE; Cultivation OF Vegetables, Flowers, Rice, Fruit, Vines, Hops OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; Watering 3

B25G - Handles FOR Hand Implements 3

B26D - CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing 3

B67B - Applying Closure Members TO Bottles Jars, OR Similar CONTAINERS; Opening Closed Containers 3

A47G - Household OR Table Equipment 2

A22B - Slaughtering 2

G09B - Educational OR Demonstration APPLIANCES; Appliances FOR Teaching, OR Communicating With, THE Blind, Deaf OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; Diagrams 1

G01C - Measuring Distances, Levels OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; Gyroscopic INSTRUMENTS; Photogrammetry OR Videogrammetry 1

Top 15 of 25 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Fiskars Brands, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Fiskars Brands, Inc.'s lead technology class is B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 20% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B26B
Ranked #3,493 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Fiskars Brands, Inc. against ZF Active Safety GmbH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 43.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.