Where does Eagle Industry Co., Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Eagle Industry Co., Ltd. ranks #1,143 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Eagle Industry Co., Ltd. hold?

Eagle Industry Co., Ltd. holds 370 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 58 technology areas.

What is Eagle Industry Co., Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

Eagle Industry Co., Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 60.9 out of 100 (top 3% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Eagle Industry Co., Ltd. focus on?

Eagle Industry Co., Ltd.'s top technology area is F16J (Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings) with 218 patents, ranking #3 of 753 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 58 CPC subclasses total.

Is Eagle Industry Co., Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Eagle Industry Co., Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is +30% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Eagle Industry Co., Ltd.'s patents?

Eagle Industry Co., Ltd.'s patents average 10.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Eagle Industry Co., Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Eagle Industry Co., Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 370 granted patents across 58 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16J (Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Eagle ranks #1,143 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 370 patents across 58 technology areas.

#1,143
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 3%
by Innovation Score (60.9/100): 10.5
avg claims per patent: +30%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R1143 · Foreign Corporation #1,143 · 370 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-STRONG · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MID 370 grants
TOP-DECILE #1,143/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Ball Horticultural
CPC-WIDE F16J · 58 areas
INNOV-STRONG 60.9/100
CLAIMS-PAR 10.5 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-UP +30% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Ball Horticultural Company (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Eagle’s 60.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 20.4 pts (34%) Velocity 9.1 pts (15%) Breadth 25.0 pts (41%) Claim depth 6.3 pts (10%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Asahi Kasei · near

61
CSC Holdings · near

61
Eagle Industry · this assignee

61
Schneider Electric… · near

61
thyssenkrupp · near

61
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Eagle's Innovation Score is 60.9/100 (top 3% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Eagle?

Each dot is one of Eagle’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Eagle’s own 10.5 claims/patent is at or below the 13.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Eagle vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

How Eagle's grant cadence moved

Between 2020–2024, Eagle Industry Co., Ltd. received 191 grants versus 147 in 2015–2019 (+30% equal-window velocity, above median growth). Across complete PatentsView years, output peaked in 2022 at 51 grants and bottomed in 2015 at 16. Lead class F16J accounts for 58.9% of the portfolio across 58 subclasses. Volume neighbours: The Curators of the University of Missouri (#1,139) and AAC Optics Solutions Pte. Ltd. (#1,147).

Eagle's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Eagle Industry Co., Ltd. moved from 97 to 133 grants (1.37x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #552. See the growth leaderboard.

The Curators of t…

371
Ventana Medical S…

371
Ball Horticultural

370
Dentsply Sirona

370
Ivoclar Vivadent

370
Jatco

370
Welch Allyn

370
Eagle Industry ◀

370
AAC Optics Soluti…

369

What this shows Eagle holds 370 patents at rank #1,143, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Eagle

By rank, the assignees closest to #1,143 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F16J (Pistons)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Eagle's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Eagle, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In F16J (Pistons), Eagle ranks #3 of 753 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (61 here).

Asahi Kasei Kabushiki Kaisha 61 CSC Holdings, LLC 61 thyssenkrupp AG 61 Schneider Electric Industries SAS 61

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (10.5 here).

Korea Institute OF Industrial Technology 10.5 avg ABB Oy 10.5 avg Ubicquia, Inc. 10.5 avg National Jewish Health 10.5 avg

Eagle's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

61 Top 3% higher than 97% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Eagle Industry Co., Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	16	4.3%
2016	27	7.3%
2017	35	9.5%
2018	30	8.1%
2019	39	10.5%
2020	20	5.4%
2021	38	10.3%
2022	51	13.8%
2023	33	8.9%
2024	49	13.2%
2025partial year	32	8.6%

Which technologies does Eagle Industry Co., Ltd. patent most?

F16J - Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings 218

F16C - SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings 93

F16K - VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; Devices FOR Venting OR Aerating 92

F04B - Positive-displacement Machines FOR LIQUIDS; Pumps 81

F15B - Systems Acting BY Means OF Fluids IN GENERAL; Fluid-pressure Actuators, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; Details OF Fluid-pressure Systems, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 36

F05D - Indexing Scheme FOR Aspects Relating TO Non-positive-displacement Machines OR Engines, Gas-turbines OR Jet-propulsion Plants 20

F01D - Non-positive Displacement Machines OR Engines, e.g. Steam Turbines 19

F04D - Non-positive-displacement Pumps 18

F02M - Supplying Combustion Engines IN General With Combustible Mixtures OR Constituents Thereof 15

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 15

F16F - SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration 12

F04C - Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Machines FOR Liquids ; Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Pumps 11

G05D - Systems FOR Controlling OR Regulating Non-electric Variables 10

F16L - PIPES; Joints OR Fittings FOR PIPES; Supports FOR Pipes, Cables OR Protective TUBING; Means FOR Thermal Insulation IN General 10

F02C - Gas-turbine PLANTS; AIR Intakes FOR Jet-propulsion PLANTS; Controlling Fuel Supply IN Air-breathing Jet-propulsion Plants 10

Top 15 of 58 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Eagle Industry Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Eagle Industry Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is F16J (Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings), 58.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16J
Ranked #1,143 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Eagle Industry Co., Ltd. against The Curators of the University of Missouri, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 60.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.