Where does Federal-Mogul Burscheid GmbH rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Federal-Mogul Burscheid GmbH ranks #4,713 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Federal-Mogul Burscheid GmbH hold?

Federal-Mogul Burscheid GmbH holds 74 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 18 technology areas.

What is Federal-Mogul Burscheid GmbH's Innovation Score?

Federal-Mogul Burscheid GmbH has an Innovation Score of 41.9 out of 100 (top 32% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Federal-Mogul Burscheid GmbH focus on?

Federal-Mogul Burscheid GmbH's top technology area is F16J (Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings) with 66 patents, ranking #7 of 753 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 18 CPC subclasses total.

Is Federal-Mogul Burscheid GmbH's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Federal-Mogul Burscheid GmbH's recent grant velocity is -56% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Federal-Mogul Burscheid GmbH's patents?

Federal-Mogul Burscheid GmbH's patents average 12.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Federal-Mogul Burscheid GmbH patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Federal-Mogul Burscheid GmbH

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 74 granted patents across 18 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16J (Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Federal-mogul ranks #4,713 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 74 patents across 18 technology areas.

#4,713
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 32%
by Innovation Score (41.9/100): 12.5
avg claims per patent: -56%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R4713 · Foreign Corporation #4,713 · 74 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 74 grants
TOP-DECILE #4,713/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Ceremorphic
CPC-FOCUS F16J · 18 areas
INNOV-PAR 41.9/100
CLAIMS-RICH 12.5 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -56% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Ceremorphic, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Federal-mogul’s 41.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 14.9 pts (36%) Velocity 4.4 pts (11%) Breadth 15.0 pts (36%) Claim depth 7.5 pts (18%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Federal-Mogul… · this assignee

42
Koganei · near

42
Mips AB · near

42
Rion · near

42
Senju Pharmaceutical · near

42
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Federal-mogul's Innovation Score is 41.9/100 (top 32% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Federal-mogul?

Each dot is one of Federal-mogul’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Federal-mogul’s own 12.5 claims/patent is at or below the 13.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Federal-mogul vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Federal-mogul's grants concentrate

Federal-Mogul Burscheid GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 18 CPC subclasses with 89.2% of grants classified under F16J (Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (15 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2024. By volume, Federal-mogul sits between Ceremorphic, Inc. and Health Research, Inc..

Federal-mogul's three-year grant acceleration

Federal-Mogul Burscheid GmbH shows 10 grants in 2022–2024 against only 15 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Ceremorphic

74
EOS Products

74
ETO Magnetic

74
Enlitic

74
Ferno-washington

74
Flexible Steel La…

74
Goodrich Actuatio…

74
Health Research

74
Federal-mogul Bur… ◀

74

What this shows Federal-Mogul holds 74 patents at rank #4,713, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Federal-Mogul

By rank, the assignees closest to #4,713 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F16J (Pistons)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Federal-Mogul's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Federal-Mogul, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In F16J (Pistons), Federal-Mogul ranks #7 of 753 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (42 here).

Koganei Corporation 42 Rion Co., Ltd. 42 Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. 42 Mips AB 42

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (12.5 here).

Volvo CAR Corporation 12.5 avg Colgate-Palmolive Company 12.5 avg Adient US LLC 12.5 avg Accton Technology Corporation 12.5 avg

Federal-mogul's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

42 Top 32% higher than 68% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Federal-Mogul Burscheid GmbH patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	15	20.3%
2016	14	18.9%
2017	9	12.2%
2018	9	12.2%
2019	3	4.1%
2020	3	4.1%
2021	9	12.2%
2022	3	4.1%
2023	5	6.8%
2024	2	2.7%
2025partial year	2	2.7%

Which technologies does Federal-Mogul Burscheid GmbH patent most?

F16J - Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings 66

C23C - Coating Metallic MATERIAL; Coating Material With Metallic MATERIAL; Surface Treatment OF Metallic Material BY Diffusion Into THE Surface, BY Chemical Conversion OR SUBSTITUTION; Coating BY Vacuum Evaporation, BY Sputtering, BY ION Implantation OR BY Chemical Vapour Deposition, IN General 32

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 15

F02F - Cylinders, Pistons OR Casings, FOR Combustion ENGINES; Arrangements OF Sealings IN Combustion Engines 8

B23P - Metal-working NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Combined OPERATIONS; Universal Machine Tools 8

C22C - Alloys 5

C25D - Processes FOR THE Electrolytic OR Electrophoretic Production OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; Apparatus Therefor 2

B22D - Casting OF METALS; Casting OF Other Substances BY THE Same Processes OR Devices 2

B22F - Working Metallic POWDER; Manufacture OF Articles From Metallic POWDER; Making Metallic Powder ; Apparatus OR Devices Specially Adapted FOR Metallic Powder 2

G01M - Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 2

B24B - Machines, Devices, OR Processes FOR Grinding OR Polishing ; Dressing OR Conditioning OF Abrading SURFACES; Feeding OF Grinding, Polishing, OR Lapping Agents 1

C21D - Modifying THE Physical Structure OF Ferrous METALS; General Devices FOR Heat Treatment OF Ferrous OR Non-ferrous Metals OR ALLOYS; Making Metal Malleable, e.g. BY Decarburisation OR Tempering 1

C09D - Coating Compositions, e.g. Paints, Varnishes OR LACQUERS; Filling PASTES; Chemical Paint OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; Correcting FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; Pastes OR Solids FOR Colouring OR PRINTING; USE OF Materials Therefor 1

F02B - Internal-combustion Piston ENGINES; Combustion Engines IN General 1

G01B - Measuring Length, Thickness OR Similar Linear DIMENSIONS; Measuring ANGLES; Measuring AREAS; Measuring Irregularities OF Surfaces OR Contours 1

Top 15 of 18 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Federal-Mogul Burscheid GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Federal-Mogul Burscheid GmbH's lead technology class is F16J (Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings), 89.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16J
Ranked #4,713 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Federal-Mogul Burscheid GmbH against Ceremorphic, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 41.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.