Where does DeNA Co., Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), DeNA Co., Ltd. ranks #3,008 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does DeNA Co., Ltd. hold?

DeNA Co., Ltd. holds 126 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2024, spanning 13 technology areas.

What is DeNA Co., Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

DeNA Co., Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 37.9 out of 100 (top 42% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is DeNA Co., Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

DeNA Co., Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is -83% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for DeNA Co., Ltd.'s patents?

DeNA Co., Ltd.'s patents average 9.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the DeNA Co., Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

DeNA Co., Ltd.

Q: What technology areas does DeNA Co., Ltd. focus on?

DeNA Co., Ltd.'s top technology area is A63F (Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR) with 90 patents, ranking #29 of 894 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 13 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 126 granted patents across 13 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63F (Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Dena ranks #3,008 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 126 patents across 13 technology areas.

#3,008
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 42%
by Innovation Score (37.9/100): 9.2
avg claims per patent: -83%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R3008 · Foreign Corporation #3,008 · 126 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MID 126 grants
TOP-DECILE #3,008/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Ceres
CPC-FOCUS A63F · 13 areas
INNOV-THIN 37.9/100
CLAIMS-PAR 9.2 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -83% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Ceres, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Dena’s 37.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 16.7 pts (44%) Velocity 3.0 pts (8%) Breadth 12.7 pts (34%) Claim depth 5.5 pts (15%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Celgene Avilomics… · near

38
DeNA · this assignee

38
InnerOptic Technology · near

38
SRI Sports · near

38
The Charlotte… · near

38
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Dena's Innovation Score is 37.9/100 (top 42% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Dena?

Each dot is one of Dena’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Dena’s own 9.2 claims/patent is at or below the 11.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Dena vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Dena's grants concentrate

DeNA Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 13 CPC subclasses with 71.4% of grants classified under A63F (Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (40 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, Dena sits between Chatsworth Products, Inc. and Goodrich Actuation Systems Limited.

Dena's three-year grant acceleration

DeNA Co., Ltd. shows 8 grants in 2022–2024 against only 18 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Chatsworth Produc…

126
Ceres

126
Cobra Golf Incorp…

126
Dexin

126
Deutsche Post

126
Fair Isaac

126
Fyusion

126
Goodrich Actuatio…

126
Dena ◀

126

What this shows DeNA holds 126 patents at rank #3,009, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near DeNA

By rank, the assignees closest to #3,009 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63F (Card)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in DeNA's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for DeNA, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A63F (Card), DeNA ranks #29 of 894 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (38 here).

SRI Sports Limited 38 The Charlotte Mecklenburg Hospital Authority 38 InnerOptic Technology, Inc. 38 Celgene Avilomics Research, Inc. 38

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (9.2 here).

Ingenico Inc. 9.2 avg Zumtobel Lighting GmbH 9.1 avg Rigaku Corporation 9.2 avg Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences 9.1 avg

Dena's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

38 Top 42% higher than 58% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

DeNA Co., Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	40	31.7%
2016	27	21.4%
2017	26	20.6%
2018	7	5.6%
2019	8	6.3%
2020	8	6.3%
2021	2	1.6%
2022	1	0.8%
2023	3	2.4%
2024	4	3.2%

Which technologies does DeNA Co., Ltd. patent most?

A63F - Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 90

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 22

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 22

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 16

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 14

G07F - Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus 10

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 7

H04M - Telephonic Communication 3

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 2

G09G - Arrangements OR Circuits FOR Control OF Indicating Devices Using Static Means TO Present Variable Information 2

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 2

A61F - Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive DEVICES; FOMENTATION; Treatment OR Protection OF Eyes OR EARS; Bandages, Dressings OR Absorbent PADS; Firs 2

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 1

Top 13 of 13 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

DeNA Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

DeNA Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is A63F (Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 71.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63F
Ranked #3,008 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare DeNA Co., Ltd. against Chatsworth Products, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 37.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.