USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Crocus Technology Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 28 granted patents across 19 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G11C (Static Stores).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Crocus ranks #10,902 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 28 patents across 19 technology areas.

#10,902
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 45%
by Innovation Score (36.9/100)
16.5
avg claims per patent
-96%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R10902 · US Corporation #10,902 · 28 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 28 grants
  • UPPER-Q #10,902/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Cala Health
  • CPC-FOCUS G11C · 19 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 36.9/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 16.5 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -96% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cala Health, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Crocus’s 36.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Crocus

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Crocus's Innovation Score is 36.9/100 (top 45% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Crocus?

Each dot is one of Crocus’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Crocus’s own 16.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Crocus vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 27.92828.1 510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Celanese Sales Germany GMBH - 28, 23.54Celanese Sales Ge…Clph, LLC - 28, 20.36ClphComet AG - 28, 16.04CometContech Engineered Solutions LLC - 28, 16.14Contech Engineere…Crucialtec Co. Ltd - 28, 8.43CrucialtecCUE Health Inc. - 28, 8.71CUE HealthCyberdyne Inc. - 28, 9.11CyberdyneCala Health, Inc. - 28, 19.64Cala HealthCrocus Technology Inc. - 28, 16.5Crocus Technology
Crocus vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Crocus's grants concentrate

Crocus Technology Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 19 CPC subclasses with 71.4% of grants classified under G11C (Static Stores). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (9 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Crocus sits between Celanese Sales Germany GMBH and Cala Health, Inc..

Who files at Crocus's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Crocus holds 28 patents at rank #10,891, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Crocus

By rank, the assignees closest to #10,891 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G11C (Static Stores)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Crocus's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Crocus, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G11C (Static Stores), Crocus ranks #169 of 882 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Crocus's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

37 Top 45% higher than 55% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0246810 201520162017201820192021 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Crocus Technology Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 5 17.9%
2016 8 28.6%
2017 9 32.1%
2018 2 7.1%
2019 3 10.7%
2021 1 3.6%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Crocus Technology Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Crocus Technology Inc.'s lead technology class is G11C (Static Stores), 71.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G11C
  • Ranked #10,902 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Crocus Technology Inc. against Celanese Sales Germany GMBH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 36.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.