Where does Cyberdyne Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Cyberdyne Inc. ranks #10,906 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Cyberdyne Inc. hold?

Cyberdyne Inc. holds 28 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2025, spanning 31 technology areas.

What is Cyberdyne Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Cyberdyne Inc. has an Innovation Score of 43.5 out of 100 (top 28% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Cyberdyne Inc. focus on?

Cyberdyne Inc.'s top technology area is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification) with 13 patents, ranking #1,352 of 7,127 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 31 CPC subclasses total.

Is Cyberdyne Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Cyberdyne Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +300% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Cyberdyne Inc.'s patents?

Cyberdyne Inc.'s patents average 9.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Cyberdyne Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Cyberdyne Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 28 granted patents across 31 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Cyberdyne ranks #10,906 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 28 patents across 31 technology areas.

#10,906
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 28%
by Innovation Score (43.5/100): 9.1
avg claims per patent: +300%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R10906 · Foreign Corporation #10,906 · 28 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 28 grants
UPPER-Q #10,906/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Cala Health
CPC-FOCUS A61B · 31 areas
INNOV-PAR 43.5/100
CLAIMS-PAR 9.1 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +300% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cala Health, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Cyberdyne’s 43.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.6 pts (27%) Velocity 6.7 pts (15%) Breadth 19.7 pts (45%) Claim depth 5.5 pts (13%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
W Schonbek · near

43
Covaris · near

43
Cyberdyne · this assignee

43
Ixia · near

43
Pro Quick Draw · near

43
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Cyberdyne's Innovation Score is 43.5/100 (top 28% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cyberdyne?

Each dot is one of Cyberdyne’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cyberdyne’s own 9.1 claims/patent is at or below the 16.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Cyberdyne vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Cyberdyne's grants concentrate

Cyberdyne Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 31 CPC subclasses with 46.4% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Cyberdyne sits between Contech Engineered Solutions LLC and Cerebri AI Inc..

Cyberdyne's three-year grant acceleration

Cyberdyne Inc. shows 11 grants in 2022–2024 against only 11 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Contech Engineere…

28
Crocus Technology

28
Crucialtec

28
CUE Health

28
Cala Health

28
Caldwell Manufact…

28
Carlsberg Breweri…

28
Cerebri AI

28
Cyberdyne ◀

28

What this shows Cyberdyne holds 28 patents at rank #10,894, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Cyberdyne

By rank, the assignees closest to #10,894 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cyberdyne's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Cyberdyne, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A61B (Diagnosis), Cyberdyne ranks #1,352 of 7,127 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (43 here).

Covaris, LLC 43 Ixia 43 Pro Quick Draw LLC 43 W Schonbek LLC 43

Cyberdyne's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

43 Top 28% higher than 72% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Cyberdyne Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	1	3.6%
2017	1	3.6%
2018	1	3.6%
2019	2	7.1%
2020	5	17.9%
2021	4	14.3%
2022	4	14.3%
2023	4	14.3%
2024	3	10.7%
2025partial year	3	10.7%

Which technologies does Cyberdyne Inc. patent most?

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 13

A61H - Physical Therapy Apparatus, e.g. Devices FOR Locating OR Stimulating Reflex Points IN THE BODY; Artificial RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; Bathing Devices FOR Special Therapeutic OR Hygienic Purposes OR Specific Parts OF THE Body 13

B25J - MANIPULATORS; Chambers Provided With Manipulation Devices 8

A61F - Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive DEVICES; FOMENTATION; Treatment OR Protection OF Eyes OR EARS; Bandages, Dressings OR Absorbent PADS; Firs 7

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 3

A63B - Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment 3

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 3

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 3

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 3

G05B - Control OR Regulating Systems IN GENERAL; Functional Elements OF Such SYSTEMS; Monitoring OR Testing Arrangements FOR Such Systems OR Elements 2

G16H - Healthcare Informatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR THE Handling OR Processing OF Medical OR Healthcare Data 2

C12M - Apparatus FOR Enzymology OR MICROBIOLOGY; Apparatus FOR Culturing Microorganisms FOR Producing Biomass, FOR Growing Cells OR FOR Obtaining Fermentation OR Metabolic Products, i.e. Bioreactors OR Fermenters 2

G10L - Speech Analysis Techniques OR Speech SYNTHESIS; Speech RECOGNITION; Speech OR Voice Processing TECHNIQUES; Speech OR Audio Coding OR Decoding 2

G01L - Measuring Force, Stress, Torque, Work, Mechanical Power, Mechanical Efficiency, OR Fluid Pressure 2

G01M - Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 2

Top 15 of 31 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Cyberdyne Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Cyberdyne Inc.'s lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 46.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
Ranked #10,906 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Cyberdyne Inc. against Contech Engineered Solutions LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 43.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.