USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

CJD LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 18 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01F (MAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; Selection OF Materials FOR Their Magnetic Properties).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, CJD ranks #15,906 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 18 patents across 4 technology areas.

#15,906
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
5th percentile
by Innovation Score (18.3/100)
1.8
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R15906 · US Corporation #15,906 · 18 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 18 grants
  • MID-PACK #15,906/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Chryso
  • CPC-NARROW H01F · 4 areas
  • INNOV-LOW 18.3/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.8 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Chryso (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How CJD’s 18.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around CJD

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows CJD's Innovation Score is 18.3/100 (5th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for CJD?

Each dot is one of CJD’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). CJD’s own 1.8 claims/patent is at or below the 12.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

CJD vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 17.917.91818.1 05101520 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Chryso - 18, 14.61ChrysoChung HUA University - 18, 11.94Chung HUA Univers…CIG Photonics Japan Limited - 18, 12.56CIG Photonics Jap…Circor Pumps North America, LLC - 18, 16.22Circor Pumps Nort…CLEAVELAND/PRICE Inc. - 18, 18.61Cleaveland/PriceClermon ET Associes - 18, 1Clermon ET Associ…Clevermade, LLC - 18, 3.78ClevermadeClmbr1, LLC. - 18, 16.33Clmbr1CJD LLC - 18, 1.78CJD
CJD vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where CJD's grants concentrate

CJD LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 5.6% of grants classified under H01F (MAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; Selection OF Materials FOR Their Magnetic Properties). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (5 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2017. By volume, CJD sits between Chryso and Clmbr1, LLC..

Who files at CJD's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows CJD holds 18 patents at rank #15,891, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near CJD

By rank, the assignees closest to #15,891 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H01F (Magnets)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in CJD's primary technology class.

CJD's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

18 5th percentile higher than 5% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

2.533.544.555.5 2015201620172018 5
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2018

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
CJD LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 5 27.8%
2016 5 27.8%
2017 3 16.7%
2018 5 27.8%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

CJD LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • CJD LLC's lead technology class is H01F (MAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; Selection OF Materials FOR Their Magnetic Properties), 5.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01F
  • Ranked #15,906 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare CJD LLC against Chryso, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 18.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.