USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Clermon ET Associes

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 18 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Clermon ranks #15,908 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 18 patents across 0 technology areas.

#15,908
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
35th percentile
by Innovation Score (30.8/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R15908 · Foreign Corporation #15,908 · 18 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-MICRO 18 grants
  • MID-PACK #15,908/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH CIG Photonics Japan
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-THIN 30.8/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • SPAN-YRS 2022–2025 · 4y
  • BOOK-RICH 8/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: CIG Photonics Japan Limited (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Clermon’s 30.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Clermon

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Clermon's Innovation Score is 30.8/100 (35th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Clermon?

Each dot is one of Clermon’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Clermon’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 12.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Clermon vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 17.917.91818.1 05101520 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent CIG Photonics Japan Limited - 18, 12.56CIG Photonics Jap…Circor Pumps North America, LLC - 18, 16.22Circor Pumps Nort…CJD LLC - 18, 1.78CJDCLEAVELAND/PRICE Inc. - 18, 18.61Cleaveland/PriceClevermade, LLC - 18, 3.78ClevermadeClmbr1, LLC. - 18, 16.33Clmbr1Cloudminds (SHANGHAI) Robotics Co., Ltd. - 18, 13.72Cloudminds (Shang…CNA International Inc. - 18, 1.89CNA InternationalClermon ET Associes - 18, 1Clermon ET Associ…
Clermon vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Clermon's grants concentrate

Clermon ET Associes is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2022 (7 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2023. By volume, Clermon sits between CIG Photonics Japan Limited and CNA International Inc..

Clermon's three-year grant acceleration

Clermon ET Associes shows 14 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Clermon's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Clermon holds 18 patents at rank #15,893, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Clermon

By rank, the assignees closest to #15,893 in granted patent volume.

Clermon's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

31 35th percentile higher than 35% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

02468 2022202320242025 4
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2022–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Clermon ET Associes patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2022 7 38.9%
2023 1 5.6%
2024 6 33.3%
2025partial year 4 22.2%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Clermon ET Associes's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #15,908 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Clermon ET Associes against CIG Photonics Japan Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 30.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.