CPC technology class · H01
H01C - Resistors
Resistors. 2,105 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year filing trajectory.
- 2,105
- US patents granted
- H01
- Parent CPC class
- 20
- Active assignees
- +8%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
Resistors ranks #365 of 670 CPC technology areas - 2,105 US patents granted since 2015, with filing up 8% over five years.
- #365
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 2,105
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Murata Manufacturing
- leading assignee (114)
- +8%
- filing velocity, last 5 yrs
CPC subclass H01C - RESISTORS - covers 2,105 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025 according to USPTO PatentsView records, within the broader CPC class H01 (ELECTRIC ELEMENTS). See our CPC classification guide for how the system works.
The competitive landscape in H01C is shaped by 20 distinct companies actively filing in this space. Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. leads with 114 patents, followed by Rohm Co., Ltd. at 68 grants and Epcos Ag at 48.
Filing activity in H01C is up 8% over the past five years versus 2015-2019, a relatively steady filing pace. All counts come directly from USPTO PatentsView and reflect US granted utility patents only.
Is H01C innovation accelerating?
US utility-patent grants per year in H01C, 2015–2025 - recent five years are up 8% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads H01C?
The 12 most active assignees in RESISTORS - wider bars mean more grants
- Koa
KOA Corporation
88 patents
- Rohm
Rohm Co., Ltd.
68 patents
- Epcos
EPCOS AG
48 patents
- Littelfuse
Littelfuse, Inc.
47 patents
- Polytronics Technology
POLYTRONICS TECHNOLOGY CORP.
38 patents
- Altria Client Services
Altria Client Services LLC
37 patents
- Tdk 35
TDK Electronics AG
35 patents
- Watlow Electric Manuf… 32
WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY
32 patents
- Fuzetec Technology 24
FUZETEC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
24 patents
- Vishay Dale 23
Vishay Dale Electronics, LLC
23 patents
- Phoenix Contact & Kg 22
PHOENIX CONTACT GMBH & CO. KG
22 patents
- Dongguan Littelfuse 15
Dongguan Littelfuse Electronics Company Limited
15 patents
What this shows Murata Manufacturing is the most active filer in H01C, holding 114 of the 2,105 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in H01C |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | KOA Corporation | 88 |
| #2 | Rohm Co., Ltd. | 68 |
| #3 | Epcos Ag | 48 |
| #4 | Littelfuse, Inc. | 47 |
| #5 | Polytronics Technology Corp. | 38 |
| #6 | Altria Client Services Llc | 37 |
| #7 | TDK Electronics Ag | 35 |
| #8 | Watlow Electric Manufacturing Company | 32 |
| #9 | Fuzetec Technology Co., Ltd. | 24 |
| #10 | Vishay Dale Electronics, Llc | 23 |
| #11 | Phoenix Contact Gmbh & Co. KG | 22 |
| #12 | Dongguan Littelfuse Electronics Company Limited | 15 |
| #13 | AVX Corporation | 14 |
| #14 | Suncall Corporation | 11 |
| #15 | Amotech Co., Ltd. | 10 |
| #16 | Isabellenhütte Heusler Gmbh & Co. KG | 10 |
| #17 | Yageo Corporation | 10 |
| #18 | Kemet Electronics Corporation | 9 |
| #19 | Kyocera AVX Components Corporation | 9 |
| #20 | DEHN + Söhne Gmbh + Co. KG | 9 |
About This Class
CPC subclass H01C belongs to class H01.
2,105 patents were granted in this class between 2015 and 2025.
20 companies actively patent in this space.
Classification System
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) is a hierarchical patent classification system used by the USPTO and EPO.
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading H01C assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Top 14 H01C assignees by class footprint. Bubble size = patents in H01C. Source: USPTO PatentsView (claim depth is company-wide across all classes).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CPC class H01C?
How many patents have been filed in H01C?
Which company holds the most patents in H01C?
How is patent data for H01C collected?
What is the difference between CPC class and subclass?
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.