CPC technology class · F23
F23B - Methods Or Apparatus For Combustion Using Only Solid Fuel
Methods or apparatus for combustion using only solid fuel. 220 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year grant trajectory.
- 220
- US patents granted
- #11/12
- in F23
- 1.4%
- F23 class share
- +33%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Methods Or Apparatus For Combustion Using Only Solid Fuel ranks #596 of 670 CPC technology areas - 220 US patents granted since 2015, with recorded grant volume up 33% over five years.
- #596
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 220
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Weber-stephen Products
- leading assignee (9)
- +33%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
How F23B's grant cadence moved
Between 2020–2024, F23B recorded 114 grants versus 86 in 2015–2019 (+33% equal-window velocity). Across complete years, output peaked in 2024 at 27 grants and bottomed in 2015 at 11 (+145% peak-over-trough). Lead assignee Weber-Stephen Products LLC holds 4.1% of the class ; the top three share 10.5%.
Leaderboard read
F23B concentration, lead at 4.1%
Weber-Stephen Products LLC leads this historical grant record at 4.1% of F23B - us corporation assignees hold 80% of class grants (78 of 98). Figures describe granted US utility patents in this CPC subclass, not current investment or legal strength.
- Leader's share
- 4.1%
- Top three share
- 10.5%
- Lead over #2
- 0
9 of 220 grants
of the class's recorded grants
more grants than Clearsign Combustion Corporation
Where F23B sits inside F23
Among 12 subclasses in F23 (Combustion APPARATUS; Combustion Processes), F23B ranks #11 and holds 1.4% of the parent class's 15,279 recorded grants. Sibling chips below are the other subclasses in the same parent class, not the nationwide volume/lead-share peers further down.
Rising assignees active in F23B
Company-wide grant multiples (2022–2024 vs 2019–2021) among assignees with ≥5 patents in this subclass. Growth is company-wide; class patent counts are subclass-specific.
- #1 Weber-Stephen Products LLC 1.64x 52 → 85 company-wide · 9 in F23B
- #2 W.C. Bradley Co. 0.92x 12 → 11 company-wide · 5 in F23B
- #3 Clearsign Combustion Corporation 0.05x 19 → 1 company-wide · 9 in F23B
F23B grants by year, peak 2024 (27)
US utility-patent grants per year in F23B, 2015–2025 - recent five years are up 33% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads F23B?
The 12 most active assignees in Methods OR Apparatus FOR Combustion Using Only Solid Fuel - wider bars mean more grants
- Weber-stephen Products
Weber-Stephen Products LLC
9 patents
- Clearsign Combustion
Clearsign Combustion Corporation
9 patents
- W C Bradley
W.C. Bradley Co.
5 patents
- Biochar Now
Biochar Now, LLC
5 patents
- Traeger Pellet Grills
Traeger Pellet Grills, LLC
4 patents
- Biomass Controls
Biomass Controls, LLC
4 patents
- Solo Brands 3
Solo Brands, LLC
3 patents
- Dansons Us 3
Dansons US, LLC
3 patents
- Maxitrol 3
Maxitrol Company
3 patents
- United States Stove 3
United States Stove Company
3 patents
- Qingdao Genjoy Home… 3
Qingdao Genjoy Home Fashion Co., Ltd.
3 patents
- Jupiter Oxygen 3
Jupiter Oxygen Corporation
3 patents
What this shows Weber-stephen Products is the most active filer in F23B, holding 9 of the 220 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in F23B |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Weber-Stephen Products LLC | 9 |
| #2 | Clearsign Combustion Corporation | 9 |
| #3 | W.C. Bradley Co. | 5 |
| #4 | Biochar Now, LLC | 5 |
| #5 | Traeger Pellet Grills, LLC | 4 |
| #6 | Biomass Controls, LLC | 4 |
| #7 | Solo Brands, LLC | 3 |
| #8 | Dansons US, LLC | 3 |
| #9 | Maxitrol Company | 3 |
| #10 | United States Stove Company | 3 |
| #11 | Qingdao Genjoy Home Fashion Co., Ltd. | 3 |
| #12 | Jupiter Oxygen Corporation | 3 |
| #13 | North Atlantic Imports, LLC | 2 |
| #14 | Royal Melbourne Institute OF Technology | 2 |
| #15 | Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 2 |
| #16 | The Cashmere Caveman Co, Wild Kitchens Limited | 2 |
| #17 | Sierra Space Corporation | 2 |
| #18 | BioLite, Inc. | 2 |
| #19 | Martin GmbH für Umwelt- und Energietechik | 2 |
| #20 | Onward Multi-Corp. Inc. | 2 |
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading F23B assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Questions about F23B
Which company holds the most patents in F23B?
Which F23B assignees grew fastest recently?
How does F23B compare inside parent class F23?
What to do with this data
F23B in context - here's where to go next.
- Weber-Stephen Products LLC leads F23B with 9 grants in this class. See full portfolio
- F23B ranks #596 of 670 by grant volume among all tracked CPC technology areas. See the ranking
- Inside parent class F23, the largest sibling subclass is F23R with 4,138 grants. Explore F23R
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through 2026-05-15; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Methodology - F23B figures are USPTO PatentsView granted-utility totals for this subclass (220 grants in the tracked window).
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.