CPC technology class · A46
A46D - Manufacture OF Brushes
Manufacture of brushes. 538 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year filing trajectory.
- 538
- US patents granted
- A46
- Parent CPC class
- 20
- Active assignees
- +39%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
Manufacture OF Brushes ranks #533 of 670 CPC technology areas - 538 US patents granted since 2015, with filing up 39% over five years.
- #533
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 538
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Colgate-palmolive
- leading assignee (69)
- +39%
- filing velocity, last 5 yrs
CPC subclass A46D - MANUFACTURE OF BRUSHES - covers 538 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025 according to USPTO PatentsView records, within the broader CPC class A46 (BRUSHWARE). See our CPC classification guide for how the system works.
The competitive landscape in A46D is shaped by 20 distinct companies actively filing in this space. Colgate-palmolive Company leads with 69 patents, followed by Trisa Holding Ag at 26 grants and The Gillette Company Llc at 14.
Filing activity in A46D is up 39% over the past five years versus 2015-2019, a sharp acceleration suggesting an emerging or fast-moving technology area. All counts come directly from USPTO PatentsView and reflect US granted utility patents only.
Is A46D innovation accelerating?
US utility-patent grants per year in A46D, 2015–2025 - recent five years are up 39% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads A46D?
The 12 most active assignees in MANUFACTURE OF BRUSHES - wider bars mean more grants
- Colgate-palmolive
Colgate-Palmolive Company
69 patents
- Trisa Holding 26
TRISA HOLDING AG
26 patents
- The Gillette 14
The Gillette Company LLC
14 patents
- Zahoransky 14
Zahoransky AG
14 patents
- The Braun 11
The Braun Corporation
11 patents
- Geka 11
GEKA GmbH
11 patents
- Albea Services 10
ALBEA SERVICES
10 patents
- Idev 10
IDev Technologies, Inc.
10 patents
- Anisa International 8
Anisa International, Inc.
8 patents
- Kobayashi Pharmaceuti… 7
Kobayashi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
7 patents
- M+C Schiffer 6
M+C Schiffer GmbH
6 patents
- Sanderson Macleod 6
Sanderson Macleod, Inc.
6 patents
What this shows Colgate-palmolive is the most active filer in A46D, holding 69 of the 538 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in A46D |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Colgate-palmolive Company | 69 |
| #2 | Trisa Holding Ag | 26 |
| #3 | The Gillette Company Llc | 14 |
| #4 | Zahoransky Ag | 14 |
| #5 | The Braun Corporation | 11 |
| #6 | GEKA Gmbh | 11 |
| #7 | Albea Services | 10 |
| #8 | Idev Technologies, Inc. | 10 |
| #9 | Anisa International, Inc. | 8 |
| #10 | Kobayashi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | 7 |
| #11 | M+c Schiffer Gmbh | 6 |
| #12 | Sanderson Macleod, Inc. | 6 |
| #13 | Sunstar Suisse Sa | 5 |
| #14 | Bissell Inc. | 4 |
| #15 | Tangle Teezer Limited | 4 |
| #16 | Brushtech, Inc. | 4 |
| #17 | Zerobrush, Inc. | 4 |
| #18 | GUY A. Shaked Investments Ltd. | 4 |
| #19 | ELC Management Llc | 3 |
| #20 | Weber-stephen Products Llc | 3 |
About This Class
CPC subclass A46D belongs to class A46.
538 patents were granted in this class between 2015 and 2025.
20 companies actively patent in this space.
Classification System
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) is a hierarchical patent classification system used by the USPTO and EPO.
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading A46D assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Top 14 A46D assignees by class footprint. Bubble size = patents in A46D. Source: USPTO PatentsView (claim depth is company-wide across all classes).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CPC class A46D?
How many patents have been filed in A46D?
Which company holds the most patents in A46D?
How is patent data for A46D collected?
What is the difference between CPC class and subclass?
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.