Overall rank by patents
#25,585
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 10 technology areas, active 2020–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61C (DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE).
The verdict
Zerobrush holds 11 US patents across 10 technology areas, rank #25,585 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Zerobrush, Inc. has been granted 11 US utility patents between 2020 and 2025, placing Zerobrush, Inc. at rank #25,585 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 10 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 14.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61C (DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE). As a US Corporation, Zerobrush, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Zerobrush sits between Zoomdata, Inc. (11 patents, rank #25,581) and Zijilai Innovative Services Co., Ltd. (11 patents, rank #25,589) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 30.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2020 through 2025, with 11 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Zerobrush, Inc.'s 14.8 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 10 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Zerobrush, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
ZOOMDATA, INC.
11 patents
ZYXEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
11 patents
ZapFraud, Inc.
11 patents
Zee Company
11 patents
Zhejiang Guozi Robot Technology Co., Ltd.
11 patents
Zhejiang ZEEKR Automobile Research & Dev. Co., Ltd.
11 patents
Zhuji Itop Hardware Tools Co., Ltd.
11 patents
Zijilai Innovative Services Co., Ltd.
11 patents
ZeroBrush, Inc.
11 patents
What this shows Zerobrush holds 11 patents at rank #25,585, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #25,585 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Zerobrush's primary technology class.
Zerobrush's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 Top 65% higher than 35% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2021 | 5 | 45.5% |
| 2022 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2024 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2025 | 2 | 18.2% |
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#25,585
Across all tracked assignees
30.6 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Zerobrush's 11 grants land it in the top 65% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.