CPC technology class · D05
D05C - Embroidering
Embroidering; tufting. 545 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year filing trajectory.
- 545
- US patents granted
- D05
- Parent CPC class
- 20
- Active assignees
- +68%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
Embroidering ranks #532 of 670 CPC technology areas - 545 US patents granted since 2015, with filing up 68% over five years.
- #532
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 545
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Brother Kogyo
- leading assignee (94)
- +68%
- filing velocity, last 5 yrs
CPC subclass D05C - EMBROIDERING; TUFTING - covers 545 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025 according to USPTO PatentsView records, within the broader CPC class D05 (SEWING; EMBROIDERING; TUFTING). See our CPC classification guide for how the system works.
The competitive landscape in D05C is shaped by 20 distinct companies actively filing in this space. Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha leads with 94 patents, followed by Card-monroe Corp. at 50 grants and Under Armour, Inc. at 29.
Filing activity in D05C is up 68% over the past five years versus 2015-2019, a sharp acceleration suggesting an emerging or fast-moving technology area. All counts come directly from USPTO PatentsView and reflect US granted utility patents only.
Is D05C innovation accelerating?
US utility-patent grants per year in D05C, 2015–2025 - recent five years are up 68% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads D05C?
The 12 most active assignees in EMBROIDERING; TUFTING - wider bars mean more grants
- Brother Kogyo
BROTHER KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
94 patents
- Card-monroe
Card-Monroe Corp.
50 patents
- Under Armour 29
Under Armour, Inc.
29 patents
- Janome Sewing Machine 26
JANOME SEWING MACHINE CO., LTD.
26 patents
- Columbia Insurance 24
Columbia Insurance Company
24 patents
- Tuftco 19
Tuftco Corporation
19 patents
- Vandewiele 14
Vandewiele NV
14 patents
- Inteva Products 12
INTEVA PRODUCTS, LLC
12 patents
- Higgins Research & De… 10
Higgins Research & Development, LLC
10 patents
- Groz-beckert Kg 8
GROZ-BECKERT KG
8 patents
- Janome 8
JANOME CORPORATION
8 patents
- Createme 7
CreateMe Technologies Inc.
7 patents
What this shows Brother Kogyo is the most active filer in D05C, holding 94 of the 545 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in D05C |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | 94 |
| #2 | Card-monroe Corp. | 50 |
| #3 | Under Armour, Inc. | 29 |
| #4 | Janome Sewing Machine Co., Ltd. | 26 |
| #5 | Columbia Insurance Company | 24 |
| #6 | Tuftco Corporation | 19 |
| #7 | Vandewiele Nv | 14 |
| #8 | Inteva Products, Llc | 12 |
| #9 | Higgins Research & Development, Llc | 10 |
| #10 | Groz-beckert KG | 8 |
| #11 | Janome Corporation | 8 |
| #12 | Createme Technologies Inc. | 7 |
| #13 | Aladdin Manufacturing Corporation | 6 |
| #14 | Coloreel Group AB | 6 |
| #15 | ABM International, Inc. | 5 |
| #16 | Interface, Inc. | 5 |
| #17 | Singer Sourcing Limited Llc | 5 |
| #18 | TISM Co., Ltd. | 5 |
| #19 | JUKI Corporation | 4 |
| #20 | TELA Bio, Inc. | 4 |
About This Class
CPC subclass D05C belongs to class D05.
545 patents were granted in this class between 2015 and 2025.
20 companies actively patent in this space.
Classification System
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) is a hierarchical patent classification system used by the USPTO and EPO.
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading D05C assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Top 14 D05C assignees by class footprint. Bubble size = patents in D05C. Source: USPTO PatentsView (claim depth is company-wide across all classes).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CPC class D05C?
How many patents have been filed in D05C?
Which company holds the most patents in D05C?
How is patent data for D05C collected?
What is the difference between CPC class and subclass?
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.