Where does Zahoransky AG rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Zahoransky AG ranks #20,653 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Zahoransky AG hold?

Zahoransky AG holds 14 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is Zahoransky AG's Innovation Score?

Zahoransky AG has an Innovation Score of 50.4 out of 100 (top 13% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Zahoransky AG focus on?

Zahoransky AG's top technology area is A46D (Manufacture OF Brushes) with 14 patents, ranking #3 of 87 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

Is Zahoransky AG's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Zahoransky AG's recent grant velocity is +17% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Zahoransky AG's patents?

Zahoransky AG's patents average 19.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Zahoransky AG patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Zahoransky AG

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A46D (Manufacture OF Brushes).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Zahoransky ranks #20,653 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 7 technology areas.

#20,653
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 13%
by Innovation Score (50.4/100): 19.4
avg claims per patent: +17%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R20653 · Foreign Corporation #20,653 · 14 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
MID-PACK #20,653/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Zap Surgical Systems
CPC-NARROW A46D · 7 areas
INNOV-PAR 50.4/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.4 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-UP +17% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Zap Surgical Systems, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Zahoransky’s 50.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.4 pts (19%) Velocity 20.0 pts (40%) Breadth 9.4 pts (19%) Claim depth 11.7 pts (23%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Zahoransky · this assignee

50
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Zahoransky's Innovation Score is 50.4/100 (top 13% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Zahoransky?

Each dot is one of Zahoransky’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Zahoransky’s own 19.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Zahoransky vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Zahoransky's grants concentrate

Zahoransky AG is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A46D (Manufacture OF Brushes). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Zahoransky sits between Zhongshan Bolang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. and Zhejiang Jinbang Sports Equipment Co., Ltd..

Zahoransky's three-year grant acceleration

Zahoransky AG shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Zhongshan Bolang…

14
Ziosoft

14
Zizala Lichtsyste…

14
Zwipe AS

14
Zap Surgical Syst…

14
Zebra Medical Vis…

14
Zeto

14
Zhejiang Jinbang…

14
Zahoransky ◀

14

What this shows Zahoransky holds 14 patents at rank #20,652, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Zahoransky

By rank, the assignees closest to #20,652 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A46D (Manufacture OF Brushes)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Zahoransky's primary technology class.

Zahoransky's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

50 Top 13% higher than 87% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Zahoransky AG patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	14.3%
2016	1	7.1%
2017	1	7.1%
2018	1	7.1%
2019	1	7.1%
2020	1	7.1%
2022	4	28.6%
2024	2	14.3%
2025partial year	1	7.1%

Which technologies does Zahoransky AG patent most?

A46D - Manufacture OF Brushes 14

A46B - Brushes 8

B26D - CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing 1

B25B - Tools OR Bench Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR, FOR Fastening, Connecting, Disengaging OR Holding 1

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 1

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 1

B08B - Cleaning IN GENERAL; Prevention OF Fouling IN General 1

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Zahoransky AG's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Zahoransky AG's lead technology class is A46D (Manufacture OF Brushes), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A46D
Ranked #20,653 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Zahoransky AG against Zhongshan Bolang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 50.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.