Where does xMEMS Labs, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), xMEMS Labs, Inc. ranks #4,365 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does xMEMS Labs, Inc. hold?

xMEMS Labs, Inc. holds 82 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2025, spanning 24 technology areas.

What is xMEMS Labs, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

xMEMS Labs, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 58.1 out of 100 (top 5% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is xMEMS Labs, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

xMEMS Labs, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +1575% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for xMEMS Labs, Inc.'s patents?

xMEMS Labs, Inc.'s patents average 22.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the xMEMS Labs, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

xMEMS Labs, Inc.

Q: What technology areas does xMEMS Labs, Inc. focus on?

xMEMS Labs, Inc.'s top technology area is H04R (Loudspeakers, Microphones, Gramophone Pick-ups OR Like Acoustic Electromechanical TRANSDUCERS; Deaf-aid SETS; Public Address Systems) with 71 patents, ranking #54 of 1,513 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 24 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 82 granted patents across 24 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04R (Loudspeakers, Microphones, Gramophone Pick-ups OR Like Acoustic Electromechanical TRANSDUCERS; Deaf-aid SETS; Public Address Systems).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, xmems ranks #4,365 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 82 patents across 24 technology areas.

#4,365
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 5%
by Innovation Score (58.1/100): 22.1
avg claims per patent: +1575%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R4365 · US Corporation #4,365 · 82 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 82 grants
TOP-DECILE #4,365/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH aTyr Pharma
CPC-FOCUS H04R · 24 areas
INNOV-PAR 58.1/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 22.1 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +1575% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: aTyr Pharma, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How xmems’s 58.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 15.3 pts (26%) Velocity 12.3 pts (21%) Breadth 17.3 pts (30%) Claim depth 13.3 pts (23%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Monash University · near

58
VEO Robotics · near

58
xMEMS Labs · this assignee

58
ZF Active Safety… · near

58
Knauf Insulation · near

58
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows xmems's Innovation Score is 58.1/100 (top 5% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for xmems?

Each dot is one of xmems’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). xmems’s own 22.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 8.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

xmems vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where xmems's grants concentrate

xMEMS Labs, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 24 CPC subclasses with 86.6% of grants classified under H04R (Loudspeakers, Microphones, Gramophone Pick-ups OR Like Acoustic Electromechanical TRANSDUCERS; Deaf-aid SETS; Public Address Systems). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (19 grants) versus a trough of 4 in 2019. By volume, xmems sits between VAN Cleef & Arpels SA and Camelbak Products, LLC.

xmems's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, xMEMS Labs, Inc. moved from 25 to 46 grants (1.84x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.

VAN Cleef & Arpels

82
Yves Saint Laurent

82
atyr Pharma

82
data world

82
xmems Labs ◀

82
Arper S P A

81
BSH Bosch und Sie…

81
Borealis Technical

81
Camelbak Products

81

What this shows xMEMS holds 82 patents at rank #4,366, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near xMEMS

By rank, the assignees closest to #4,366 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04R (Loudspeakers)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in xMEMS's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for xMEMS, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In H04R (Loudspeakers), xMEMS ranks #54 of 1,513 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (58 here).

Monash University 58 VEO Robotics, Inc. 58 ZF Active Safety AND Electronics US LLC 58 Knauf Insulation, Inc. 58

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (22.1 here).

Aeris Communications, Inc. 22.1 avg Fungible, Inc. 22.1 avg Insurance Services Office, Inc. 22.1 avg Momentive Performance Materials GmbH 22.1 avg

xmems's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

58 Top 5% higher than 95% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

xMEMS Labs, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	4	4.9%
2020	13	15.9%
2021	8	9.8%
2022	17	20.7%
2023	10	12.2%
2024	19	23.2%
2025partial year	11	13.4%

Which technologies does xMEMS Labs, Inc. patent most?

H04R - Loudspeakers, Microphones, Gramophone Pick-ups OR Like Acoustic Electromechanical TRANSDUCERS; Deaf-aid SETS; Public Address Systems 71

G10K - Sound-producing DEVICES; Methods OR Devices FOR Protecting Against, OR FOR Damping, Noise OR Other Acoustic Waves IN GENERAL; Acoustics NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 32

B81B - Microstructural Devices OR Systems, e.g. Micromechanical Devices 22

H02M - Apparatus FOR Conversion Between AC AND AC, Between AC AND DC, OR Between DC AND DC, AND FOR USE With Mains OR Similar Power Supply SYSTEMS; Conversion OF DC OR AC Input Power Into Surge Output POWER; Control OR Regulation Thereof 9

H03F - Amplifiers 9

B81C - Processes OR Apparatus Specially Adapted FOR THE Manufacture OR Treatment OF Microstructural Devices OR Systems 7

H03M - CODING; DECODING; Code Conversion IN General 6

H03K - Pulse Technique 6

H04S - Stereophonic Systems 2

H03D - Demodulation OR Transference OF Modulation From ONE Carrier TO Another 2

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 2

H03H - Impedance Networks, e.g. Resonant CIRCUITS; Resonators 2

G05B - Control OR Regulating Systems IN GENERAL; Functional Elements OF Such SYSTEMS; Monitoring OR Testing Arrangements FOR Such Systems OR Elements 2

Y02B - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Buildings, e.g. Housing, House Appliances OR Related End-user Applications 1

B06B - Methods OR Apparatus FOR Generating OR Transmitting Mechanical Vibrations OF Infrasonic, Sonic, OR Ultrasonic Frequency, ; e.g.; FOR Performing Mechanical Work IN General 1

Top 15 of 24 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

xMEMS Labs, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

xMEMS Labs, Inc.'s lead technology class is H04R (Loudspeakers, Microphones, Gramophone Pick-ups OR Like Acoustic Electromechanical TRANSDUCERS; Deaf-aid SETS; Public Address Systems), 86.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04R
Ranked #4,365 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare xMEMS Labs, Inc. against VAN Cleef & Arpels SA, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 58.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.