Overall rank by patents
#4,364
of 49,997 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 82 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A44C (Personal Adornments, e.g. JEWELLERY; Coins).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, VAN ranks #4,364 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 82 patents across 3 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R4364 · Foreign Corporation #4,364 · 82 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: aTyr Pharma, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Wah Hung Group · near
25 score
Pham Holdings · near
25 score
VAN Cleef & Arpels · this assignee
25 score
J-Devices · near
25 score
THE Conard Pyle · near
25 score
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows VAN's Innovation Score is 24.6/100 (15th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
VAN Cleef & Arpels SA is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 1.2% of grants classified under A44C (Personal Adornments, e.g. JEWELLERY; Coins). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (19 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, VAN sits between SkyBell Technologies, Inc. and xMEMS Labs, Inc..
From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, VAN Cleef & Arpels SA moved from 43 to 16 grants (0.37x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
SkyBell Technologies, Inc.
82 patents
Stabilus GmbH
82 patents
Ultralogic 6G, LLC
82 patents
Usnr, LLC
82 patents
Yves Saint Laurent
82 patents
aTyr Pharma, Inc.
82 patents
data.world, Inc.
82 patents
xMEMS Labs, Inc.
82 patents
VAN Cleef & Arpels SA
82 patents
What this shows VAN holds 82 patents at rank #4,362, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #4,362 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in VAN's primary technology class.
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for VAN, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (25 here).
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (1.2 here).
VAN's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 15th percentile higher than 15% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 1.2% |
| 2017 | 13 | 15.9% |
| 2018 | 3 | 3.7% |
| 2019 | 15 | 18.3% |
| 2020 | 9 | 11.0% |
| 2021 | 19 | 23.2% |
| 2022 | 2 | 2.4% |
| 2023 | 10 | 12.2% |
| 2024 | 4 | 4.9% |
| 2025partial year | 6 | 7.3% |
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#4,364
of 49,997 tracked assignees
24.6 out of 100
What to do with this data
VAN Cleef & Arpels SA's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.