Camelbak Products, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 81 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR F).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Camelbak ranks #4,370 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 81 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #4,370
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 43rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (32.9/100)
- 8.6
- avg claims per patent
- +217%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R4370 · US Corporation #4,370 · 81 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 81 grants
- TOP-DECILE #4,370/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Arper S P A
- CPC-NARROW B65D · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 32.9/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 8.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +217% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Arper S.P.A. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Camelbak’s 32.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Camelbak
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Camelbak Products · this assignee 33
Camelbak Products · this assignee
33 score
- E-best Holding · near 33
E-best Holding · near
33 score
- NEW Flyer Industries… · near 33
NEW Flyer Industries… · near
33 score
- Turkiye Sise VE CAM… · near 33
Turkiye Sise VE CAM… · near
33 score
- Trico Products · near 33
Trico Products · near
33 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Camelbak's Innovation Score is 32.9/100 (43rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Camelbak?
Each dot is one of Camelbak’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Camelbak’s own 8.6 claims/patent is at or below the 17.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Camelbak's grants concentrate
Camelbak Products, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 32.1% of grants classified under B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR F). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (17 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2015. By volume, Camelbak sits between xMEMS Labs, Inc. and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta.
Camelbak's three-year grant acceleration
From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Camelbak Products, LLC moved from 38 to 26 grants (0.68x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.
Who files at Camelbak's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- xmems Labs
xMEMS Labs, Inc.
82 patents
- Arper S P A
Arper S.P.A.
81 patents
- BSH Bosch und Sie…
BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH
81 patents
- Borealis Technical
Borealis Technical Limited
81 patents
- Clearsign Combust…
Clearsign Combustion Corporation
81 patents
- Clemson Universit…
Clemson University Research Foundation
81 patents
- Cvdevices
CVDevices, LLC
81 patents
- Children's Health…
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
81 patents
- Camelbak Products ◀
Camelbak Products, LLC
81 patents
What this shows Camelbak holds 81 patents at rank #4,370, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Camelbak
By rank, the assignees closest to #4,370 in granted patent volume.
- xMEMS Labs, Inc. #4,366 · 82 patents
- Arper S.P.A. #4,367 · 81 patents
- BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH #4,368 · 81 patents
- Borealis Technical Limited #4,369 · 81 patents
- Clearsign Combustion Corporation #4,371 · 81 patents
- Clemson University Research Foundation #4,372 · 81 patents
- CVDevices, LLC #4,373 · 81 patents
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta #4,374 · 81 patents
Leaders in B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Camelbak's primary technology class.
- The Procter & Gamble Company 471 in class
- Graphic Packaging International, LLC 329 in class
- Sonoco Development, Inc. 252 in class
- Altria Client Services LLC 165 in class
- S. C. Johnson & SON, Inc. 162 in class
- Nestec S.A. 150 in class
- Yoshino Kogyosho Co., Ltd. 150 in class
- Toyo Seikan Co., Ltd. 141 in class
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Camelbak, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials), Camelbak ranks #118 of 3,365 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (33 here).
Similar claim depth
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (8.6 here).
Camelbak's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
33 43rd percentile higher than 43% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 2.5% |
| 2016 | 2 | 2.5% |
| 2017 | 4 | 4.9% |
| 2018 | 3 | 3.7% |
| 2019 | 7 | 8.6% |
| 2020 | 17 | 21.0% |
| 2021 | 14 | 17.3% |
| 2022 | 13 | 16.0% |
| 2023 | 9 | 11.1% |
| 2024 | 4 | 4.9% |
| 2025partial year | 6 | 7.4% |
Which technologies does Camelbak Products, LLC patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Camelbak Products, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Camelbak Products, LLC's lead technology class is B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR F), 32.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B65D
- Ranked #4,370 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Camelbak Products, LLC against xMEMS Labs, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 32.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.