Overall rank by patents
#2,104
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 188 granted patents across 32 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: C07K (PEPTIDES).
The verdict
VIB holds 188 US patents across 32 technology areas, rank #2,104 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
VIB VZW has been granted 188 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing VIB VZW at rank #2,104 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 32 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 13.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in C07K (PEPTIDES). As a Foreign Corporation, VIB VZW is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, VIB sits between Nanning Fugui Precision Industrial Co., Ltd. (188 patents, rank #2,100) and Breville Pty Limited (187 patents, rank #2,108) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 51.1/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 101 grants, compared with 87 in the 2015–2019 window, a +16% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. VIB VZW's 13.0 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 32 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark VIB VZW against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
NANNING FUGUI PRECISION INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.
188 patents
Starbucks Corporation
188 patents
Symbotic LLC
188 patents
The Royal Institution for the Advancement of Learning/McGill University
188 patents
Visteon Global Technologies, Inc.
188 patents
WIDEX A/S
188 patents
Walker Edison Furniture Company LLC
188 patents
VIB VZW
188 patents
Breville Pty Limited
187 patents
What this shows VIB holds 188 patents at rank #2,104, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #2,104 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in VIB's primary technology class.
VIB's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
51 Top 12% higher than 88% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 10 | 5.3% |
| 2016 | 15 | 8.0% |
| 2017 | 17 | 9.0% |
| 2018 | 29 | 15.4% |
| 2019 | 16 | 8.5% |
| 2020 | 16 | 8.5% |
| 2021 | 27 | 14.4% |
| 2022 | 21 | 11.2% |
| 2023 | 9 | 4.8% |
| 2024 | 16 | 8.5% |
| 2025 | 12 | 6.4% |
Overall rank by patents
#2,104
Across all tracked assignees
51.1 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
VIB's 188 grants land it in the top 12% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.