USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

The Royal Institution for the Advancement of Learning/McGill University

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 188 granted patents across 127 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61K (Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, The ranks #2,103 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 188 patents across 127 technology areas.

#2,103
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 6%
by Innovation Score (56.8/100)
15.7
avg claims per patent
-23%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R2103 · Foreign Corporation #2,103 · 188 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MID 188 grants
  • TOP-DECILE #2,103/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Hamilton Beach Brands
  • CPC-WIDE A61K · 127 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 56.8/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 15.7 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DOWN -23% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around The

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows The's Innovation Score is 56.8/100 (top 6% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

How The's grant cadence moved

Between 2020–2024, The Royal Institution for the Advancement of Learning/McGill University received 77 grants versus 100 in 2015–2019 (-23% equal-window velocity, below median growth). Across complete PatentsView years, output peaked in 2019 at 31 grants and bottomed in 2024 at 9. Lead class A61K accounts for 22.3% of the portfolio across 127 subclasses. Volume neighbours: Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. (#2,099) and Walker Edison Furniture Company LLC (#2,107).

The's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, The Royal Institution for the Advancement of Learning/McGill University moved from 66 to 42 grants (0.64x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #2,345. See the growth leaderboard.

Who files at The's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows The holds 188 patents at rank #2,103, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near The

By rank, the assignees closest to #2,103 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61K (Preparations FOR Medical)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in The's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for The, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

The's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

57 Top 6% higher than 94% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

5101520253035 20152016201720182019202020212022202320242025 11
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
The Royal Institution for the Advancement of Learning/McGill University patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 17 9.0%
2016 22 11.7%
2017 15 8.0%
2018 15 8.0%
2019 31 16.5%
2020 22 11.7%
2021 13 6.9%
2022 18 9.6%
2023 15 8.0%
2024 9 4.8%
2025partial year 11 5.9%

Which technologies does The Royal Institution for the Advancement of Learning/McGill University patent most?

Top 15 of 127 technology areas

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#2,103

of 49,997 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

56.8 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

The Royal Institution for the Advancement of Learning/McGill University's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • The Royal Institution for the Advancement of Learning/McGill University's lead technology class is A61K (Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes), 22.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61K
  • Ranked #2,103 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare The Royal Institution for the Advancement of Learning/McGill University against Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 56.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.