Where does TQ-Systems GmbH rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), TQ-Systems GmbH ranks #15,707 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does TQ-Systems GmbH hold?

TQ-Systems GmbH holds 19 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 19 technology areas.

What is TQ-Systems GmbH's Innovation Score?

TQ-Systems GmbH has an Innovation Score of 57.2 out of 100 (top 5% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does TQ-Systems GmbH focus on?

TQ-Systems GmbH's top technology area is F16H (Gearing) with 15 patents, ranking #188 of 1,603 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 19 CPC subclasses total.

Is TQ-Systems GmbH's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

TQ-Systems GmbH's recent grant velocity is +100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for TQ-Systems GmbH's patents?

TQ-Systems GmbH's patents average 19.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the TQ-Systems GmbH patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

TQ-Systems GmbH

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 19 granted patents across 19 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16H (Gearing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Tq-systems ranks #15,707 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 19 patents across 19 technology areas.

#15,707
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 5%
by Innovation Score (57.2/100): 19.0
avg claims per patent: +100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R15707 · Foreign Corporation #15,707 · 19 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 19 grants
MID-PACK #15,707/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Titanium Metals
CPC-FOCUS F16H · 19 areas
INNOV-PAR 57.2/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.0 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Titanium Metals Corporation (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Tq-systems’s 57.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 10.3 pts (18%) Velocity 20.0 pts (35%) Breadth 15.4 pts (27%) Claim depth 11.4 pts (20%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
TQ-Systems · this assignee

57
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Tq-systems's Innovation Score is 57.2/100 (top 5% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Tq-systems?

Each dot is one of Tq-systems’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Tq-systems’s own 19.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Tq-systems vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Tq-systems's grants concentrate

TQ-Systems GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 19 CPC subclasses with 78.9% of grants classified under F16H (Gearing). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Tq-systems sits between Titanium Metals Corporation and Trvstper, Inc..

Tq-systems's three-year grant acceleration

TQ-Systems GmbH shows 11 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Titanium Metals

19
Tiveni Mergeco

19
Tombow Pencil

19
Tosho

19
Transocean Innova…

19
Trevena

19
Tri-state Environ…

19
Trvstper

19
Tq-systems ◀

19

What this shows TQ-Systems holds 19 patents at rank #15,685, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near TQ-Systems

By rank, the assignees closest to #15,685 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F16H (Gearing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in TQ-Systems's primary technology class.

Tq-systems's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

57 Top 5% higher than 95% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

TQ-Systems GmbH patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	10.5%
2016	1	5.3%
2017	1	5.3%
2019	2	10.5%
2021	1	5.3%
2022	2	10.5%
2023	5	26.3%
2024	4	21.1%
2025partial year	1	5.3%

Which technologies does TQ-Systems GmbH patent most?

F16H - Gearing 15

B62M - Rider Propulsion OF Wheeled Vehicles OR SLEDGES; Powered Propulsion OF Sledges OR ; SINGLE-TRACK; CYCLES; Transmissions Specially Adapted FOR Such Vehicles 11

Y02T - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Transportation 6

H02K - Dynamo-electric Machines 5

B60K - Arrangement OR Mounting OF Propulsion Units OR OF Transmissions IN VEHICLES; Arrangement OR Mounting OF Plural Diverse Prime-movers IN VEHICLES; Auxiliary Drives FOR VEHICLES; Instrumentation OR Dashboards FOR VEHICLES; Arrangements IN Connection With Cooling, AIR Intake, GAS Exhaust OR Fuel Supply 5

G01L - Measuring Force, Stress, Torque, Work, Mechanical Power, Mechanical Efficiency, OR Fluid Pressure 3

F16C - SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings 3

F16D - Couplings FOR Transmitting ROTATION; CLUTCHES; Brakes 3

B62J - Cycle Saddles OR SEATS; Auxiliary Devices OR Accessories Specially Adapted TO Cycles AND NOT Otherwise Provided FOR, e.g. Article Carriers OR Cycle Protectors 3

G01M - Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 3

H02M - Apparatus FOR Conversion Between AC AND AC, Between AC AND DC, OR Between DC AND DC, AND FOR USE With Mains OR Similar Power Supply SYSTEMS; Conversion OF DC OR AC Input Power Into Surge Output POWER; Control OR Regulation Thereof 1

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 1

F16G - Belts, Cables, OR Ropes, Predominantly Used FOR Driving PURPOSES; CHAINS; Fittings Predominantly Used Therefor 1

H02B - Boards, Substations OR Switching Arrangements FOR THE Supply OR Distribution OF Electric Power 1

H01F - MAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; Selection OF Materials FOR Their Magnetic Properties 1

Top 15 of 19 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

TQ-Systems GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

TQ-Systems GmbH's lead technology class is F16H (Gearing), 78.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16H
Ranked #15,707 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare TQ-Systems GmbH against Titanium Metals Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 57.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.