Tri-state Environmental, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 19 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B08B (Cleaning IN GENERAL; Prevention OF Fouling IN General).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Tri-state ranks #15,711 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 19 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #15,711
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 44th percentile
- by Innovation Score (33.2/100)
- 17.6
- avg claims per patent
- +100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R15711 · US Corporation #15,711 · 19 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 19 grants
- MID-PACK #15,711/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Tosho
- CPC-NARROW B08B · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 33.2/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Tosho, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Tri-state’s 33.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Tri-state
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Tri-state Environmen… · this assignee 33
Tri-state Environmen… · this assignee
33 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Tri-state's Innovation Score is 33.2/100 (44th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Tri-state?
Each dot is one of Tri-state’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Tri-state’s own 17.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Tri-state's grants concentrate
Tri-state Environmental, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under B08B (Cleaning IN GENERAL; Prevention OF Fouling IN General). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Tri-state sits between Tosho, Inc. and TTTech Auto AG.
Tri-state's three-year grant acceleration
Tri-state Environmental, LLC shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 9 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Tri-state's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Tosho
Tosho, Inc.
19 patents
- Tq-systems
TQ-Systems GmbH
19 patents
- Transocean Innova…
Transocean Innovation Labs Ltd.
19 patents
- Trevena
Trevena, Inc.
19 patents
- Trvstper
Trvstper, Inc.
19 patents
- TSE
TSE Co., Ltd.
19 patents
- TSG
TSG Technologies, LLC
19 patents
- Tttech Auto
TTTech Auto AG
19 patents
- Tri-state Environ… ◀
Tri-state Environmental, LLC
19 patents
What this shows Tri-state holds 19 patents at rank #15,688, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Tri-state
By rank, the assignees closest to #15,688 in granted patent volume.
- Tosho, Inc. #15,684 · 19 patents
- TQ-Systems GmbH #15,685 · 19 patents
- Transocean Innovation Labs Ltd. #15,686 · 19 patents
- Trevena, Inc. #15,687 · 19 patents
- Trvstper, Inc. #15,689 · 19 patents
- TSE Co., Ltd. #15,690 · 19 patents
- TSG Technologies, LLC #15,691 · 19 patents
- TTTech Auto AG #15,692 · 19 patents
Leaders in B08B (Cleaning IN General)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Tri-state's primary technology class.
Tri-state's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
33 44th percentile higher than 44% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 5.3% |
| 2018 | 1 | 5.3% |
| 2019 | 4 | 21.1% |
| 2020 | 2 | 10.5% |
| 2021 | 3 | 15.8% |
| 2022 | 1 | 5.3% |
| 2023 | 3 | 15.8% |
| 2024 | 3 | 15.8% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 5.3% |
Which technologies does Tri-state Environmental, LLC patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Tri-state Environmental, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Tri-state Environmental, LLC's lead technology class is B08B (Cleaning IN GENERAL; Prevention OF Fouling IN General), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B08B
- Ranked #15,711 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Tri-state Environmental, LLC against Tosho, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 33.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.