Overall rank by patents
#25,414
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 8 technology areas, active 2015–2023. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A63F (CARD, BOARD, OR ROULETTE GAMES; INDOOR GAMES USING SMALL MOVING PLAYING BODIES; VIDEO GAMES; GAMES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR).
The verdict
Timeplay holds 11 US patents across 8 technology areas, rank #25,414 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Timeplay Inc. has been granted 11 US utility patents between 2015 and 2023, placing Timeplay Inc. at rank #25,414 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 8 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 26.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in A63F (CARD, BOARD, OR ROULETTE GAMES; INDOOR GAMES USING SMALL MOVING PLAYING BODIES; VIDEO GAMES; GAMES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR). As a Foreign Corporation, Timeplay Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Timeplay sits between Tigenix, S.a.u. (11 patents, rank #25,410) and Touratech Ag (11 patents, rank #25,418) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 40.3/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 3 grants, compared with 8 in the 2015–2019 window, a -62% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Timeplay Inc.'s 26.6 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while concentration in 8 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Timeplay Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Tigenix, S.A.U.
11 patents
TigerGraph, Inc.
11 patents
Tigera, Inc.
11 patents
Tilera Corporation
11 patents
Tive, Inc.
11 patents
Tolomatic, Inc.
11 patents
ToolTech, LLC
11 patents
Touratech AG
11 patents
TimePlay Inc.
11 patents
What this shows Timeplay holds 11 patents at rank #25,414, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Timeplay's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
40 Top 36% higher than 64% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2017 | 6 | 54.5% |
| 2019 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2021 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2022 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2023 | 1 | 9.1% |
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#25,414
Across all tracked assignees
40.3 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Timeplay's 11 grants land it in the top 36% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.