USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Threebond Co., Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 65 granted patents across 36 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C09J (ADHESIVES; NON-MECHANICAL ASPECTS OF ADHESIVE PROCESSES IN GENERAL; ADHESIVE PROCESSES NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE; USE OF MATERIALS AS ADHESIVES).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

Total patents granted

CPC technology areas

11.7

Avg claims per patent

+262%

5-year grant velocity

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Threebond ranks #5,330 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 65 patents across 36 technology areas.

#5,330
of 50,000 US assignees by volume: Top 11%
by Innovation Score (51.5/100): 11.7
avg claims per patent: +262%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Threebond Co., Ltd. has been granted 65 US utility patents between 2018 and 2025, placing Threebond Co., Ltd. at #5,330 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 36 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 11.7 claims per patent with primary concentration in C09J (ADHESIVES; NON-MECHANICAL ASPECTS OF ADHESIVE PROCESSES IN GENERAL; ADHESIVE PROCESSES NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE; USE OF MATERIALS AS ADHESIVES). As a Foreign Corporation, Threebond Co., Ltd. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Threebond sits between Suphatchatwong Innovation Co., Ltd. (65 patents, rank #5,325) and UTAC Headquarters Pte. Ltd. (65 patents, rank #5,333) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 51.5/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Between 2020 and 2024 the company received 47 grants, compared with 13 in the 2015–2019 window, a +262% shift in five-year grant velocity. Both windows cover five complete grant years; the latest PatentsView year is a partial release and is excluded from this comparison, though it still appears in the yearly table and chart below. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The Foreign Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.

Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Threebond Co., Ltd.'s 11.7 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 36 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.

Suphatchatwong In…

65
Swarovski-optik &…

65
THE BANK OF NEW Y…

65
Theragun

65
Toshiba Client So…

65
Toshiba Internati…

65
Twist Bioscience

65
UTAC Headquarters…

65
Threebond ◀

65

What this shows Threebond holds 65 patents at rank #5,329, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Threebond

By rank, the assignees closest to #5,329 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C09J (Adhesives)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Threebond's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Threebond, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (52 here).

Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. 52 Ineos Styrolution Group Gmbh 52 Cooledge Lighting Inc. 52 Rolls-royce High Temperature Composites, Inc. 52

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (11.7 here).

Chi Mei Communication Systems, Inc. 11.7 avg Valent Biosciences Llc 11.7 avg International Engine Intellectual Property Company, Llc 11.7 avg Giga-byte Technology Co., Ltd. 11.7 avg

Threebond's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

52 Top 11% higher than 89% of 50,000 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Threebond Co., Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2018	2	3.1%
2019	11	16.9%
2020	7	10.8%
2021	7	10.8%
2022	13	20.0%
2023	10	15.4%
2024	10	15.4%
2025partial year	5	7.7%

Which technologies does Threebond Co., Ltd. patent most?

C09J - ADHESIVES; NON-MECHANICAL ASPECTS OF ADHESIVE PROCESSES IN GENERAL; ADHESIVE PROCESSES NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE; USE OF MATERIALS AS ADHESIVES 30

C08F - MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS 29

C08K - Use of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients 28

C08L - COMPOSITIONS OF MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS 26

C08G - MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED OTHERWISE THAN BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING UNSATURATED CARBON-TO-CARBON BONDS 21

C09K - MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE 19

C09D - COATING COMPOSITIONS, e.g. PAINTS, VARNISHES OR LACQUERS; FILLING PASTES; CHEMICAL PAINT OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; CORRECTING FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; PASTES OR SOLIDS FOR COLOURING OR PRINTING; USE OF MATERIALS THEREFOR 17

Y02E - REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION 11

H01M - PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY 11

H01B - CABLES; CONDUCTORS; INSULATORS; SELECTION OF MATERIALS FOR THEIR CONDUCTIVE, INSULATING OR DIELECTRIC PROPERTIES 8

F16J - PISTONS ; CYLINDERS; SEALINGS 7

B32B - LAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM 5

B05C - APPARATUS FOR APPLYING FLUENT MATERIALS TO SURFACES, IN GENERAL 5

C08J - WORKING-UP; GENERAL PROCESSES OF COMPOUNDING; AFTER-TREATMENT NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C08B, C08C, C08F, C08G or C08H 5

A61Q - SPECIFIC USE OF COSMETICS OR SIMILAR TOILETRY PREPARATIONS 4

Top 15 of 36 technology areas

Grant record at a glance

Portfolio Volume 65 grants

CPC subclasses 36

Avg. claims / grant 11.7

Velocity +262%

Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#5,330

of 50,000 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

51.5 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does Threebond Co., Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Threebond Co., Ltd. ranks #5,330 of 50,000 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Threebond Co., Ltd. hold?

Threebond Co., Ltd. holds 65 US utility patents granted between 2018 and 2025, spanning 36 technology areas.

What is Threebond Co., Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

Threebond Co., Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 51.5 out of 100 (top 11% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Threebond Co., Ltd. focus on?

Threebond Co., Ltd.'s top technology area is C09J (ADHESIVES; NON-MECHANICAL ASPECTS OF ADHESIVE PROCESSES IN GENERAL; ADHESIVE PROCESSES NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE; USE OF MATERIALS AS ADHESIVES) with 30 patents. Grants appear in 36 CPC subclasses total.

Is Threebond Co., Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Threebond Co., Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is +262% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Threebond Co., Ltd.'s patents?

Threebond Co., Ltd.'s patents average 11.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Threebond Co., Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Threebond's 65 grants land it in the top 11% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Threebond ranks #5,330 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
Most of this portfolio concentrates in C09J - see who else leads that technology area. C09J leaders
Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.