Where does Threebond Co., Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Threebond Co., Ltd. ranks #5,330 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Threebond Co., Ltd. hold?

Threebond Co., Ltd. holds 65 US utility patents granted between 2018 and 2025, spanning 36 technology areas.

What is Threebond Co., Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

Threebond Co., Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 51.5 out of 100 (top 11% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Threebond Co., Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Threebond Co., Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is +262% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Threebond Co., Ltd.'s patents?

Threebond Co., Ltd.'s patents average 11.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Threebond Co., Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Threebond Co., Ltd.

Q: What technology areas does Threebond Co., Ltd. focus on?

Threebond Co., Ltd.'s top technology area is C09J (ADHESIVES; Non-mechanical Aspects OF Adhesive Processes IN GENERAL; Adhesive Processes NOT Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; USE OF Materials AS Adhesives) with 30 patents, ranking #38 of 837 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 36 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 65 granted patents across 36 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C09J (ADHESIVES; Non-mechanical Aspects OF Adhesive Processes IN GENERAL; Adhesive Processes NOT Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; USE OF Materials AS Adhesives).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Threebond ranks #5,330 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 65 patents across 36 technology areas.

#5,330
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 11%
by Innovation Score (51.5/100): 11.7
avg claims per patent: +262%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R5330 · Foreign Corporation #5,330 · 65 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 65 grants
UPPER-Q #5,330/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Suphatchatwong…
CPC-FOCUS C09J · 36 areas
INNOV-PAR 51.5/100
CLAIMS-PAR 11.7 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +262% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Suphatchatwong Innovation Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Threebond’s 51.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 14.5 pts (28%) Velocity 8.8 pts (17%) Breadth 21.2 pts (41%) Claim depth 7.0 pts (14%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Cooledge Lighting · near

52
Cornell Research… · near

52
Ineos Styrolution… · near

52
Rolls-Royce High… · near

52
Threebond · this assignee

52
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Threebond's Innovation Score is 51.5/100 (top 11% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Threebond?

Each dot is one of Threebond’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Threebond’s own 11.7 claims/patent is at or below the 15.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Threebond vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Threebond's grants concentrate

Threebond Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 36 CPC subclasses with 46.2% of grants classified under C09J (ADHESIVES; Non-mechanical Aspects OF Adhesive Processes IN GENERAL; Adhesive Processes NOT Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; USE OF Materials AS Adhesives). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (13 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2018. By volume, Threebond sits between Suphatchatwong Innovation Co., Ltd. and Utac Headquarters Pte. Ltd..

Threebond's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Threebond Co., Ltd. moved from 25 to 33 grants (1.32x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.

Suphatchatwong In…

65
Swarovski-optik &…

65
THE Bank OF NEW Y…

65
Theragun

65
Toshiba Client So…

65
Toshiba Internati…

65
Twist Bioscience

65
Utac Headquarters…

65
Threebond ◀

65

What this shows Threebond holds 65 patents at rank #5,329, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Threebond

By rank, the assignees closest to #5,329 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C09J (Adhesives)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Threebond's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Threebond, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In C09J (Adhesives), Threebond ranks #38 of 837 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (52 here).

Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. 52 Ineos Styrolution Group GMBH 52 Cooledge Lighting Inc. 52 Rolls-Royce High Temperature Composites, Inc. 52

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (11.7 here).

Chi Mei Communication Systems, Inc. 11.7 avg Valent Biosciences LLC 11.7 avg International Engine Intellectual Property Company, LLC 11.7 avg Giga-byte Technology Co., Ltd. 11.7 avg

Threebond's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

52 Top 11% higher than 89% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Threebond Co., Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2018	2	3.1%
2019	11	16.9%
2020	7	10.8%
2021	7	10.8%
2022	13	20.0%
2023	10	15.4%
2024	10	15.4%
2025partial year	5	7.7%

Which technologies does Threebond Co., Ltd. patent most?

C09J - ADHESIVES; Non-mechanical Aspects OF Adhesive Processes IN GENERAL; Adhesive Processes NOT Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; USE OF Materials AS Adhesives 30

C08F - Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Involving Carbon-to-carbon Unsaturated Bonds 29

C08K - Use of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients 28

C08L - Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds 26

C08G - Macromolecular Compounds Obtained Otherwise Than BY Reactions Only Involving Unsaturated Carbon-to-carbon Bonds 21

C09K - Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere 19

C09D - Coating Compositions, e.g. Paints, Varnishes OR LACQUERS; Filling PASTES; Chemical Paint OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; Correcting FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; Pastes OR Solids FOR Colouring OR PRINTING; USE OF Materials Therefor 17

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 11

H01M - Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy 11

H01B - CABLES; CONDUCTORS; INSULATORS; Selection OF Materials FOR Their Conductive, Insulating OR Dielectric Properties 8

F16J - Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings 7

B32B - Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form 5

B05C - Apparatus FOR Applying Fluent Materials TO Surfaces, IN General 5

C08J - WORKING-UP; General Processes OF COMPOUNDING; After-treatment NOT Covered BY Subclasses C08b, C08c, C08f, C08g or C08h 5

A61Q - Specific USE OF Cosmetics OR Similar Toiletry Preparations 4

Top 15 of 36 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Threebond Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Threebond Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is C09J (ADHESIVES; Non-mechanical Aspects OF Adhesive Processes IN GENERAL; Adhesive Processes NOT Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; USE OF Materials AS Adhesives), 46.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C09J
Ranked #5,330 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Threebond Co., Ltd. against Suphatchatwong Innovation Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 51.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.