Where does Think Laboratory Co., Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Think Laboratory Co., Ltd. ranks #11,477 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Think Laboratory Co., Ltd. hold?

Think Laboratory Co., Ltd. holds 27 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2024, spanning 22 technology areas.

What is Think Laboratory Co., Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

Think Laboratory Co., Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 37.8 out of 100 (top 43% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Think Laboratory Co., Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Think Laboratory Co., Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is +45% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Think Laboratory Co., Ltd.'s patents?

Think Laboratory Co., Ltd.'s patents average 11.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Think Laboratory Co., Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Think Laboratory Co., Ltd.

Q: What technology areas does Think Laboratory Co., Ltd. focus on?

Think Laboratory Co., Ltd.'s top technology area is B41J (TYPEWRITERS; Selective Printing Mechanisms, i.e. Mechanisms Printing Otherwise Than From A FORME; Correction OF Typographical Errors) with 12 patents, ranking #107 of 598 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 22 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 27 granted patents across 22 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B41J (TYPEWRITERS; Selective Printing Mechanisms, i.e. Mechanisms Printing Otherwise Than From A FORME; Correction OF Typographical Errors).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Think ranks #11,477 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 27 patents across 22 technology areas.

#11,477
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 43%
by Innovation Score (37.8/100): 11.9
avg claims per patent: +45%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R11477 · Foreign Corporation #11,477 · 27 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 27 grants
UPPER-Q #11,477/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Terex GB
CPC-FOCUS B41J · 22 areas
INNOV-THIN 37.8/100
CLAIMS-PAR 11.9 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-UP +45% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Terex GB Limited (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Think’s 37.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.5 pts (30%) Velocity 2.6 pts (7%) Breadth 16.6 pts (44%) Claim depth 7.2 pts (19%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Rexnord Flattop… · near

38
Santoku · near

38
Think Laboratory · this assignee

38
TQ Delta · near

38
Xiamen Soothingware… · near

38
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Think's Innovation Score is 37.8/100 (top 43% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Think?

Each dot is one of Think’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Think’s own 11.9 claims/patent is at or below the 16.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Think vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Think's grants concentrate

Think Laboratory Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 22 CPC subclasses with 44.4% of grants classified under B41J (TYPEWRITERS; Selective Printing Mechanisms, i.e. Mechanisms Printing Otherwise Than From A FORME; Correction OF Typographical Errors). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (8 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Think sits between Terex GB Limited and TLC Biopharmaceuticals, Inc..

Think's three-year grant acceleration

Think Laboratory Co., Ltd. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 13 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Terex GB

27
THE City Universi…

27
THE George Washin…

27
THE Mclean Hospit…

27
THL Holding

27
Tineco Intelligen…

27
Tissuetech

27
TLC Biopharmaceut…

27
Think Laboratory ◀

27

What this shows Think holds 27 patents at rank #11,463, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Think

By rank, the assignees closest to #11,463 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B41J (Typewriters)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Think's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Think, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In B41J (Typewriters), Think ranks #107 of 598 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (38 here).

Rexnord Flattop Europe B.V. 38 Xiamen Soothingware Sanitary Co., Ltd. 38 Santoku Corporation 38 TQ Delta, LLC 38

Think's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

38 Top 43% higher than 57% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Think Laboratory Co., Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	5	18.5%
2016	1	3.7%
2017	1	3.7%
2018	2	7.4%
2019	2	7.4%
2020	8	29.6%
2021	3	11.1%
2022	3	11.1%
2024	2	7.4%

Which technologies does Think Laboratory Co., Ltd. patent most?

B41J - TYPEWRITERS; Selective Printing Mechanisms, i.e. Mechanisms Printing Otherwise Than From A FORME; Correction OF Typographical Errors 12

B41M - Printing, Duplicating, Marking, OR Copying PROCESSES; Colour Printing, 10

B41C - Processes FOR THE Manufacture OR Reproduction OF Printing Surfaces 8

B41F - Printing Machines OR Presses 6

B41N - Printing Plates OR Foils ; Materials FOR Surfaces Used IN Printing Machines FOR Printing, Inking, Damping, OR THE LIKE; Preparing Such Surfaces FOR USE AND Conserving Them 6

C09D - Coating Compositions, e.g. Paints, Varnishes OR LACQUERS; Filling PASTES; Chemical Paint OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; Correcting FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; Pastes OR Solids FOR Colouring OR PRINTING; USE OF Materials Therefor 4

G03F - Photomechanical Production OF Textured OR Patterned Surfaces, e.g. FOR Printing, FOR Processing OF Semiconductor DEVICES; Materials THEREFOR; Originals THEREFOR; Apparatus Specially Adapted THEREFOR; 3

C25D - Processes FOR THE Electrolytic OR Electrophoretic Production OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; Apparatus Therefor 3

B05C - Apparatus FOR Applying Fluent Materials TO Surfaces, IN General 2

B25J - MANIPULATORS; Chambers Provided With Manipulation Devices 2

G06K - Graphical Data Reading ; Presentation OF DATA; Record CARRIERS; Handling Record Carriers 2

H05K - Printed CIRCUITS; Casings OR Constructional Details OF Electric APPARATUS; Manufacture OF Assemblages OF Electrical Components 1

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 1

H01L - Semiconductor Devices NOT Covered BY Class H10 1

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 1

Top 15 of 22 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Think Laboratory Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Think Laboratory Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is B41J (TYPEWRITERS; Selective Printing Mechanisms, i.e. Mechanisms Printing Otherwise Than From A FORME; Correction OF Typographical Errors), 44.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B41J
Ranked #11,477 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Think Laboratory Co., Ltd. against Terex GB Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 37.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.