Overall rank by patents
#11,832
of 50,000 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 26 granted patents across 23 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: Y10S (TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, The ranks #11,832 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 26 patents across 23 technology areas.
The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Jr. University has been granted 26 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Jr. University at #11,832 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 23 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 18.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in Y10S (TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS). As a US Corporation, The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Jr. University is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, The sits between TYR Tactical, Llc (26 patents, rank #11,839) and Touch Bionics Limited (26 patents, rank #11,847) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 43.8/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Between 2020 and 2024 the company received 11 grants, compared with 14 in the 2015–2019 window, a -21% shift in five-year grant velocity. Both windows cover five complete grant years; the latest PatentsView year is a partial release and is excluded from this comparison, though it still appears in the yearly table and chart below. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The US Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.
Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Jr. University's 18.8 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 23 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
TYR Tactical, LLC
26 patents
Taiyuan University of Science and Technology
26 patents
Takazono Technology Incorporated
26 patents
Telescent Inc.
26 patents
The Government of the United States of America, represented by the Secretary of Homeland Security
26 patents
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
26 patents
Torrey Pines Logic, Inc.
26 patents
Touch Bionics Limited
26 patents
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Jr. University
26 patents
What this shows The holds 26 patents at rank #11,843, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #11,843 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in The's primary technology class.
The's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
44 Top 27% higher than 73% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 6 | 23.1% |
| 2016 | 2 | 7.7% |
| 2017 | 2 | 7.7% |
| 2018 | 2 | 7.7% |
| 2019 | 2 | 7.7% |
| 2020 | 5 | 19.2% |
| 2021 | 1 | 3.8% |
| 2023 | 3 | 11.5% |
| 2024 | 2 | 7.7% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 3.8% |
Top 15 of 23 technology areas
Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.
Overall rank by patents
#11,832
of 50,000 tracked assignees
43.8 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
The's 26 grants land it in the top 27% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.