CPC technology class · C09
C09C - Treatment Of Inorganic Materials
Treatment of inorganic materials, other than fibrous fillers, to enhance their pigmenting or filling properties ; preparation of carbon black ; ; preparation of inorganic materials which are no single chemical compounds and which are mainly used as pigments or fillers. 2,483 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year grant trajectory.
- 2,483
- US patents granted
- #5/8
- in C09
- 3.3%
- C09 class share
- -21%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Treatment Of Inorganic Materials ranks #345 of 670 CPC technology areas - 2,483 US patents granted since 2015, with recorded grant volume down 21% over five years.
- #345
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 2,483
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Omya International
- leading assignee (169)
- -21%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
How C09C's grant cadence moved
Between 2020–2024, C09C recorded 966 grants versus 1,230 in 2015–2019 (-21% equal-window velocity). Across complete years, output peaked in 2017 at 258 grants and bottomed in 2023 at 162 (+59% peak-over-trough). Lead assignee Omya International AG holds 6.8% of the class ; the top three share 10.9%.
Leaderboard read
C09C concentration, lead at 6.8%
Omya International AG leads this historical grant record at 6.8% of C09C - foreign corporation assignees hold 65% of class grants (680 of 1,054). Figures describe granted US utility patents in this CPC subclass, not current investment or legal strength.
- Leader's share
- 6.8%
- Top three share
- 10.9%
- Lead over #2
- 116
169 of 2,483 grants
of the class's recorded grants
more grants than Viavi Solutions Inc.
Where C09C sits inside C09
Among 8 subclasses in C09 (DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; Natural RESINS; ADHESIVES; Compositions NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Applications OF Materials NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), C09C ranks #5 and holds 3.3% of the parent class's 74,898 recorded grants. Sibling chips below are the other subclasses in the same parent class, not the nationwide volume/lead-share peers further down.
Rising assignees active in C09C
Company-wide grant multiples (2022–2024 vs 2019–2021) among assignees with ≥5 patents in this subclass. Growth is company-wide; class patent counts are subclass-specific.
- #1 Titan Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha 5.00x 1 → 5 company-wide · 5 in C09C
- #2 Schaefer Kalk GmbH & Co. KG 4.00x 1 → 4 company-wide · 6 in C09C
- #3 Monolith Materials, Inc. 3.00x 5 → 15 company-wide · 24 in C09C
- #4 Tokuyama Corporation 1.94x 36 → 70 company-wide · 10 in C09C
- #5 Glycomimetics, Inc. 1.83x 6 → 11 company-wide · 6 in C09C
C09C grants by year, peak 2017 (258)
US utility-patent grants per year in C09C, 2015–2025 - recent five years are down 21% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads C09C?
The 12 most active assignees in Treatment OF Inorganic Materials, Other Than Fibrous Fillers, TO Enhance Their Pigmenting OR Filling Properties ; Preparation OF Carbon Black ; ; Preparation OF Inorganic Materials Which ARE NO Single Chemical Compounds AND Which ARE Mainly Used AS Pigments OR Fillers - wider bars mean more grants
- Omya International
Omya International AG
169 patents
- Viavi Solutions 53
Viavi Solutions Inc.
53 patents
- Cabot 48
Cabot Corporation
48 patents
- Eckart 45
Eckart GmbH
45 patents
- Sakai Chemical… 24
Sakai Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.
24 patents
- Monolith Materials 24
Monolith Materials, Inc.
24 patents
- Rohm and Haas 17
Rohm and Haas Company
17 patents
- Jgc Catalysts and… 17
JGC Catalysts and Chemicals Ltd.
17 patents
- Nippon Sheet Glass 16
Nippon Sheet Glass Company, Limited
16 patents
- Lanxess Deutschland 16
Lanxess Deutschland GmbH
16 patents
- M Technique 15
M. Technique Co., Ltd.
15 patents
- Sumitomo Osaka Cement 14
Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd.
14 patents
What this shows Omya International is the most active filer in C09C, holding 169 of the 2,483 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in C09C |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Omya International AG | 169 |
| #2 | Viavi Solutions Inc. | 53 |
| #3 | Cabot Corporation | 48 |
| #4 | Eckart GmbH | 45 |
| #5 | Sakai Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. | 24 |
| #6 | Monolith Materials, Inc. | 24 |
| #7 | Rohm and Haas Company | 17 |
| #8 | JGC Catalysts and Chemicals Ltd. | 17 |
| #9 | Nippon Sheet Glass Company, Limited | 16 |
| #10 | Lanxess Deutschland GmbH | 16 |
| #11 | M. Technique Co., Ltd. | 15 |
| #12 | Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd. | 14 |
| #13 | Toyo Aluminium Kabushiki Kaisha | 12 |
| #14 | Landa Labs (2012) Ltd. | 12 |
| #15 | THE Chemours Company TT, LLC | 12 |
| #16 | Coatex | 11 |
| #17 | CQV Co., Ltd. | 11 |
| #18 | Tokuyama Corporation | 10 |
| #19 | Imertech SAS | 10 |
| #20 | Imerys USA, Inc. | 10 |
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading C09C assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Classes near C09C's 2,483-grant footprint
Nationwide nearest neighbors for C09C (#345 of 670 by volume ; lead share 6.8%) - not the C09 parent-class siblings above.
Nearest by grant volume
Questions about C09C
Which company holds the most patents in C09C?
Which C09C assignees grew fastest recently?
How does C09C compare inside parent class C09?
What to do with this data
C09C in context - here's where to go next.
- Omya International AG leads C09C with 169 grants in this class. See full portfolio
- C09C ranks #345 of 670 by grant volume among all tracked CPC technology areas. See the ranking
- Inside parent class C09, the largest sibling subclass is C09K with 29,124 grants. Explore C09K
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through 2026-05-15; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Methodology - C09C figures are USPTO PatentsView granted-utility totals for this subclass (2,483 grants in the tracked window).
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.