Where does The Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), The Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University ranks #5,719 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does The Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University hold?

The Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University holds 60 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 74 technology areas.

What is The Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University's Innovation Score?

The Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University has an Innovation Score of 50.3 out of 100 (top 13% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does The Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University focus on?

The Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University's top technology area is A61K (Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes) with 14 patents, ranking #1,619 of 7,163 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 74 CPC subclasses total.

Is The Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

The Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University's recent grant velocity is +48% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for The Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University's patents?

The Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University's patents average 13.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

The Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University

Q: How is the The Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 60 granted patents across 74 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61K (Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, The ranks #5,719 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 60 patents across 74 technology areas.

#5,719
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 13%
by Innovation Score (50.3/100): 13.1
avg claims per patent: +48%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R5719 · US Corporation #5,719 · 60 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 60 grants
UPPER-Q #5,719/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Spanx
CPC-WIDE A61K · 74 areas
INNOV-PAR 50.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 13.1 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-UP +48% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Spanx, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How The’s 50.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 14.2 pts (28%) Velocity 3.2 pts (6%) Breadth 25.0 pts (50%) Claim depth 7.8 pts (16%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Daewoo Shipbuilding… · near

50
Nitto Boseki · near

50
The Board of… · this assignee

50
Trading International · near

50
SR · near

50
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows The's Innovation Score is 50.3/100 (top 13% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for The?

Each dot is one of The’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). The’s own 13.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

The vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

How The's grant cadence moved

Between 2020–2024, The Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University received 34 grants versus 23 in 2015–2019 (+48% equal-window velocity, above median growth). Across complete PatentsView years, output peaked in 2020 at 13 grants and bottomed in 2015 at 2. Lead class A61K accounts for 23.3% of the portfolio across 74 subclasses. Volume neighbours: Spanx, LLC (#5,714) and Vertice Oil Tools Inc. (#5,722).

The's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, The Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University moved from 27 to 13 grants (0.48x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.

Spanx

60
Switchlab (Shangh…

60
Teac

60
Turbomeca

60
The University of…

60
University OF Yam…

60
Viacom Internatio…

60
Vertice Oil Tools

60
The Board of Rege… ◀

60

What this shows The holds 60 patents at rank #5,718, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near The

By rank, the assignees closest to #5,718 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61K (Preparations FOR Medical)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in The's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for The, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A61K (Preparations FOR Medical), The ranks #1,619 of 7,163 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (50 here).

Nitto Boseki Co., Ltd. 50 Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., Ltd. 50 Trading Technologies International, Inc. 50 SR Technologies, Inc. 50

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (13.1 here).

Kiss Nail Products, Inc. 13.1 avg Huntsman International LLC 13.1 avg Zoetis Services LLC 13.1 avg Industry-academic Cooperation Foundation, Yonsei University 13.1 avg

The's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

50 Top 13% higher than 87% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

The Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	3.3%
2016	4	6.7%
2017	4	6.7%
2018	7	11.7%
2019	6	10.0%
2020	13	21.7%
2021	8	13.3%
2022	7	11.7%
2023	4	6.7%
2024	2	3.3%
2025partial year	3	5.0%

Which technologies does The Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University patent most?

A61K - Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes 14

C08K - Use of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients 9

C07D - Heterocyclic Compounds 9

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 9

C12N - Microorganisms OR ENZYMES; Compositions THEREOF; Propagating, Preserving, OR Maintaining MICROORGANISMS; Mutation OR Genetic ENGINEERING; Culture Media 9

Y02A - Technologies FOR Adaptation TO Climate Change 8

A61P - Specific Therapeutic Activity OF Chemical Compounds OR Medicinal Preparations 7

C08J - WORKING-UP; General Processes OF COMPOUNDING; After-treatment NOT Covered BY Subclasses C08b, C08c, C08f, C08g or C08h 5

B01J - Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus 5

C12P - Fermentation OR Enzyme-using Processes TO Synthesise A Desired Chemical Compound OR Composition OR TO Separate Optical Isomers From A Racemic Mixture 5

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 5

C08G - Macromolecular Compounds Obtained Otherwise Than BY Reactions Only Involving Unsaturated Carbon-to-carbon Bonds 4

B82Y - Specific Uses OR Applications OF NANOSTRUCTURES; Measurement OR Analysis OF NANOSTRUCTURES; Manufacture OR Treatment OF Nanostructures 4

C12M - Apparatus FOR Enzymology OR MICROBIOLOGY; Apparatus FOR Culturing Microorganisms FOR Producing Biomass, FOR Growing Cells OR FOR Obtaining Fermentation OR Metabolic Products, i.e. Bioreactors OR Fermenters 4

C07K - Peptides 4

Top 15 of 74 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

The Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

The Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University's lead technology class is A61K (Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes), 23.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61K
Ranked #5,719 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare The Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University against Spanx, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 50.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.