Trading Technologies International, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 472 granted patents across 16 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative,).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Trading ranks #940 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 472 patents across 16 technology areas.
- #940
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 13%
- by Innovation Score (50.3/100)
- 14.2
- avg claims per patent
- +53%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R940 · US Corporation #940 · 472 grants
GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MID 472 grants
- TOP-DECILE #940/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Memorial Sloan…
- CPC-FOCUS G06Q · 16 areas
- INNOV-PAR 50.3/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 14.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +53% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (±1 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Trading’s 50.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Trading
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Daewoo Shipbuilding… · near
Daewoo Shipbuilding… · near
50 score
- Nitto Boseki · near
Nitto Boseki · near
50 score
- The Board of… · near
The Board of… · near
50 score
- Trading International · this assignee
Trading International · this assignee
50 score
- TRW Automotive · near
TRW Automotive · near
50 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Trading's Innovation Score is 50.3/100 (top 13% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Trading?
Each dot is one of Trading’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Trading’s own 14.2 claims/patent is at or below the 19.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Trading's grants concentrate
Trading Technologies International, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 16 CPC subclasses with 96% of grants classified under G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative,). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (70 grants) versus a trough of 9 in 2016. By volume, Trading sits between Stratasys Ltd. and Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc..
Trading's three-year grant acceleration
From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Trading Technologies International, Inc. moved from 161 to 153 grants (0.95x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #1,319. See the growth leaderboard.
Who files at Trading's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Stratasys
Stratasys Ltd.
476 patents
- Landmark Graphics
Landmark Graphics Corporation
474 patents
- Memorial Sloan Ke…
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
473 patents
- Uatc
Uatc, LLC
473 patents
- Trading Internati… ◀
Trading Technologies International, Inc.
472 patents
- Adeia Guides
Adeia Guides Inc.
470 patents
- Directv
Directv, LLC
469 patents
- Nordson
Nordson Corporation
469 patents
- Varian Semiconduc…
Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc.
469 patents
What this shows Trading holds 472 patents at rank #940, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Trading
By rank, the assignees closest to #940 in granted patent volume.
- Stratasys Ltd. #936 · 476 patents
- Landmark Graphics Corporation #937 · 474 patents
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center #938 · 473 patents
- Uatc, LLC #939 · 473 patents
- Adeia Guides Inc. #941 · 470 patents
- Directv, LLC #942 · 469 patents
- Nordson Corporation #943 · 469 patents
- Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. #944 · 469 patents
Leaders in G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Trading's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 6,621 in class
- Google LLC 3,295 in class
- Capital ONE Services, LLC 3,005 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 2,993 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 2,990 in class
- Facebook, Inc. 1,919 in class
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 1,697 in class
- Mastercard International Incorporated 1,644 in class
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Trading, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially…), Trading ranks #36 of 6,520 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (50 here).
Similar claim depth
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (14.2 here).
Trading's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
50 Top 13% higher than 87% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 11 | 2.3% |
| 2016 | 9 | 1.9% |
| 2017 | 45 | 9.5% |
| 2018 | 59 | 12.5% |
| 2019 | 49 | 10.4% |
| 2020 | 70 | 14.8% |
| 2021 | 42 | 8.9% |
| 2022 | 45 | 9.5% |
| 2023 | 56 | 11.9% |
| 2024 | 52 | 11.0% |
| 2025partial year | 34 | 7.2% |
Which technologies does Trading Technologies International, Inc. patent most?
Top 15 of 16 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Trading Technologies International, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Trading Technologies International, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative,), 96% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06Q
- Ranked #940 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Trading Technologies International, Inc. against Stratasys Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 50.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.