CPC technology class · H03
H03C - Modulation
Modulation. 490 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year filing trajectory.
- 490
- US patents granted
- H03
- Parent CPC class
- 20
- Active assignees
- -33%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
Modulation ranks #546 of 670 CPC technology areas - 490 US patents granted since 2015, with filing down 33% over five years.
- #546
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 490
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- ubeam
- leading assignee (19)
- -33%
- filing velocity, last 5 yrs
CPC subclass H03C - MODULATION - covers 490 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025 according to USPTO PatentsView records, within the broader CPC class H03 (ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY). See our CPC classification guide for how the system works.
The competitive landscape in H03C is shaped by 20 distinct companies actively filing in this space. Ubeam Inc. leads with 19 patents, followed by Parkervision, Inc. at 11 grants and Intel Mobile Communications Gmbh at 7.
Filing activity in H03C is down 33% over the past five years versus 2015-2019, a notable slowdown that may signal a maturing field. All counts come directly from USPTO PatentsView and reflect US granted utility patents only.
Is H03C innovation accelerating?
US utility-patent grants per year in H03C, 2015–2025 - recent five years are down 33% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads H03C?
The 12 most active assignees in MODULATION - wider bars mean more grants
- ubeam
uBeam Inc.
19 patents
- Parkervision
ParkerVision, Inc.
11 patents
- Intel Mobile Communic… 7
Intel Mobile Communications GmbH
7 patents
- Stichting Imec Nederl… 4
Stichting IMEC Nederland
4 patents
- Aviat U S 4
Aviat U.S., Inc.
4 patents
- The Alfred E Mann Fou… 4
The Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific Research
4 patents
- Innophase 4
Innophase, Inc.
4 patents
- Icom Incorporated 3
ICOM INCORPORATED
3 patents
- Beken 3
Beken Corporation
3 patents
- Tensorcom 3
Tensorcom, Inc.
3 patents
- Sunrise Micro Devices 3
SUNRISE MICRO DEVICES, INC.
3 patents
- Stmicroelectronics Ra… 3
STMicroelectronics Razvoj Polprevodnikov D.O.O.
3 patents
What this shows ubeam is the most active filer in H03C, holding 19 of the 490 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in H03C |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Ubeam Inc. | 19 |
| #2 | Parkervision, Inc. | 11 |
| #3 | Intel Mobile Communications Gmbh | 7 |
| #4 | Stichting IMEC Nederland | 4 |
| #5 | Aviat U.s., Inc. | 4 |
| #6 | The Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research | 4 |
| #7 | Innophase, Inc. | 4 |
| #8 | ICOM Incorporated | 3 |
| #9 | Beken Corporation | 3 |
| #10 | Tensorcom, Inc. | 3 |
| #11 | Sunrise Micro Devices, Inc. | 3 |
| #12 | Stmicroelectronics Razvoj Polprevodnikov D.o.o. | 3 |
| #13 | Stryker Combo L.l.c. | 3 |
| #14 | Technology For Energy Corporation | 3 |
| #15 | Blue Danube Systems, Inc. | 2 |
| #16 | IXI Technology Holdings, Inc. | 2 |
| #17 | Amirkabir University OF Technology | 2 |
| #18 | Skaichips Co., Ltd. | 2 |
| #19 | Cambridge Resonant Technologies Ltd. | 2 |
| #20 | CPG Technologies, Llc | 1 |
About This Class
CPC subclass H03C belongs to class H03.
490 patents were granted in this class between 2015 and 2025.
20 companies actively patent in this space.
Classification System
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) is a hierarchical patent classification system used by the USPTO and EPO.
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading H03C assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Top 14 H03C assignees by class footprint. Bubble size = patents in H03C. Source: USPTO PatentsView (claim depth is company-wide across all classes).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CPC class H03C?
How many patents have been filed in H03C?
Which company holds the most patents in H03C?
How is patent data for H03C collected?
What is the difference between CPC class and subclass?
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.