Where does Shanghai Tianma Am-oled Co., Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Shanghai Tianma Am-oled Co., Ltd. ranks #1,209 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Shanghai Tianma Am-oled Co., Ltd. hold?

Shanghai Tianma Am-oled Co., Ltd. holds 351 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2023, spanning 40 technology areas.

What is Shanghai Tianma Am-oled Co., Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

Shanghai Tianma Am-oled Co., Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 53.3 out of 100 (top 9% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Shanghai Tianma Am-oled Co., Ltd. focus on?

Shanghai Tianma Am-oled Co., Ltd.'s top technology area is H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices) with 186 patents, ranking #31 of 791 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 40 CPC subclasses total.

Is Shanghai Tianma Am-oled Co., Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Shanghai Tianma Am-oled Co., Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is -1% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Shanghai Tianma Am-oled Co., Ltd.'s patents?

Shanghai Tianma Am-oled Co., Ltd.'s patents average 16.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Shanghai Tianma Am-oled Co., Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Shanghai Tianma Am-oled Co., Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 351 granted patents across 40 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Shanghai ranks #1,209 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 351 patents across 40 technology areas.

#1,209
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 9%
by Innovation Score (53.3/100): 16.6
avg claims per patent: -1%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R1209 · Foreign Corporation #1,209 · 351 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MID 351 grants
TOP-DECILE #1,209/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Biedermann & KG
CPC-WIDE H10K · 40 areas
INNOV-PAR 53.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.6 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-FLAT -1% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Biedermann Technologies GMBH & Co. KG (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Shanghai’s 53.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 20.3 pts (38%) Velocity 0.8 pts (1%) Breadth 22.4 pts (42%) Claim depth 9.9 pts (19%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Citic Dicastal · near

53
Novellus Systems · near

53
REG Synthetic Fuels · near

53
Shanghai Tianma… · this assignee

53
Transitions Optical · near

53
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Shanghai's Innovation Score is 53.3/100 (top 9% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Shanghai?

Each dot is one of Shanghai’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Shanghai’s own 16.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Shanghai vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Shanghai's grants concentrate

Shanghai Tianma Am-oled Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 40 CPC subclasses with 53% of grants classified under H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (92 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Shanghai sits between Seiko Instruments Inc. and Gamblit Gaming, LLC.

Shanghai's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Shanghai Tianma Am-oled Co., Ltd. moved from 240 to 27 grants (0.11x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #3,159. See the growth leaderboard.

Seiko Instruments

352
Biedermann & KG

351
Dongwoo Fine-chem

351
Lumentum Operatio…

351
Shenzhen Smoore T…

351
Shanghai Tianma A… ◀

351
Clarion

350
Codexis

350
Gamblit Gaming

350

What this shows Shanghai holds 351 patents at rank #1,209, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Shanghai

By rank, the assignees closest to #1,209 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Shanghai's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Shanghai, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices), Shanghai ranks #31 of 791 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (53 here).

Transitions Optical, Ltd. 53 REG Synthetic Fuels, LLC 53 Citic Dicastal Co., Ltd. 53 Novellus Systems, Inc. 53

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (16.6 here).

Precision Planting LLC 16.6 avg University of Louisville Research Foundation, Inc. 16.6 avg Total Research & Technology Feluy 16.6 avg CMR Surgical Limited 16.6 avg

Shanghai's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

53 Top 9% higher than 91% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Shanghai Tianma Am-oled Co., Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	0.3%
2016	15	4.3%
2017	28	8.0%
2018	40	11.4%
2019	92	26.2%
2020	88	25.1%
2021	60	17.1%
2022	21	6.0%
2023	6	1.7%

Which technologies does Shanghai Tianma Am-oled Co., Ltd. patent most?

H10K - Organic Electric Solid-state Devices 186

G09G - Arrangements OR Circuits FOR Control OF Indicating Devices Using Static Means TO Present Variable Information 181

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 38

H10D - Inorganic Electric Semiconductor Devices 36

G11C - Static Stores 24

G02F - Optical Devices OR Arrangements FOR THE Control OF Light BY Modification OF THE Optical Properties OF THE Media OF THE Elements Involved THEREIN; Non-linear OPTICS; Frequency-changing OF LIGHT; Optical Logic ELEMENTS; Optical ANALOGUE/DIGITAL Converters 21

C07D - Heterocyclic Compounds 19

C09K - Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere 16

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 15

H01L - Semiconductor Devices NOT Covered BY Class H10 14

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 14

H05B - Electric HEATING; Electric Light Sources NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Circuit Arrangements FOR Electric Light Sources, IN General 7

H05K - Printed CIRCUITS; Casings OR Constructional Details OF Electric APPARATUS; Manufacture OF Assemblages OF Electrical Components 7

G02B - Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus 6

C07F - Acyclic, Carbocyclic OR Heterocyclic Compounds Containing Elements Other Than Carbon, Hydrogen, Halogen, Oxygen, Nitrogen, Sulfur, Selenium OR Tellurium 6

Top 15 of 40 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Shanghai Tianma Am-oled Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Shanghai Tianma Am-oled Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices), 53% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H10K
Ranked #1,209 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Shanghai Tianma Am-oled Co., Ltd. against Seiko Instruments Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 53.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.