Where does Rogers Corporation rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Rogers Corporation ranks #3,782 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Rogers Corporation hold?

Rogers Corporation holds 96 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 54 technology areas.

What is Rogers Corporation's Innovation Score?

Rogers Corporation has an Innovation Score of 66.2 out of 100 (top 1% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Rogers Corporation focus on?

Rogers Corporation's top technology area is H01Q (Antennas, i.e. Radio Aerials) with 44 patents, ranking #72 of 1,637 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 54 CPC subclasses total.

Is Rogers Corporation's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Rogers Corporation's recent grant velocity is +220% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Rogers Corporation's patents?

Rogers Corporation's patents average 22.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Rogers Corporation patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Rogers Corporation

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 96 granted patents across 54 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01Q (Antennas, i.e. Radio Aerials).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Rogers ranks #3,782 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 96 patents across 54 technology areas.

#3,782
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 1%
by Innovation Score (66.2/100): 22.6
avg claims per patent: +220%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R3782 · US Corporation #3,782 · 96 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-STRONG · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 96 grants
TOP-DECILE #3,782/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Karma Automotive
CPC-WIDE H01Q · 54 areas
INNOV-STRONG 66.2/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 22.6 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +220% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Karma Automotive LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Rogers’s 66.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 15.8 pts (24%) Velocity 11.8 pts (18%) Breadth 25.0 pts (38%) Claim depth 13.5 pts (20%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Dana Italia S R L · near

66
Pacesetter · near

66
Kuwait University · near

66
Rogers · this assignee

66
Bard Access Systems · near

66
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Rogers's Innovation Score is 66.2/100 (top 1% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Rogers?

Each dot is one of Rogers’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Rogers’s own 22.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Rogers vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

How Rogers's grant cadence moved

Between 2020–2024, Rogers Corporation received 64 grants versus 20 in 2015–2019 (+220% equal-window velocity, above median growth). Across complete PatentsView years, output peaked in 2023 at 16 grants and bottomed in 2015 at 1. Lead class H01Q accounts for 45.8% of the portfolio across 54 subclasses. Volume neighbours: Karma Automotive LLC (#3,778) and TRW Automotive U.S. LLC (#3,786).

Rogers's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Rogers Corporation moved from 26 to 46 grants (1.77x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.

Karma Automotive

96
Knoll

96
Lite-on Opto Tech…

96
Mitsubishi Tanabe…

96
Rosemount Tank Ra…

96
Shenzhen SNC Opto

96
Suncoke Technolog…

96
TRW Automotive U S

96
Rogers ◀

96

What this shows Rogers holds 96 patents at rank #3,782, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Rogers

By rank, the assignees closest to #3,782 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H01Q (Antennas)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Rogers's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Rogers, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In H01Q (Antennas), Rogers ranks #72 of 1,637 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (66 here).

Kuwait University 66 Bard Access Systems, Inc. 66 Pacesetter, Inc. 66 Dana Italia S.R.L. 66

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (22.6 here).

Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. 22.6 avg Blue River Technology Inc. 22.6 avg Berg Companies, Inc. 22.6 avg Movidius Limited 22.6 avg

Rogers's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

66 Top 1% higher than 99% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Rogers Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	1.0%
2016	2	2.1%
2017	4	4.2%
2018	5	5.2%
2019	8	8.3%
2020	9	9.4%
2021	9	9.4%
2022	15	15.6%
2023	16	16.7%
2024	15	15.6%
2025partial year	12	12.5%

Which technologies does Rogers Corporation patent most?

H01Q - Antennas, i.e. Radio Aerials 44

C08K - Use of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients 21

H01F - MAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; Selection OF Materials FOR Their Magnetic Properties 20

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 18

H05K - Printed CIRCUITS; Casings OR Constructional Details OF Electric APPARATUS; Manufacture OF Assemblages OF Electrical Components 16

B32B - Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form 14

B33Y - Additive Manufacturing, i.e. Manufacturing OF Three-dimensional [3-D] Objects BY Additive Deposition, Additive Agglomeration OR Additive Layering, e.g. BY 3-D Printing, Stereolithography OR Selective Laser Sintering 13

C01G - Compounds Containing Metals NOT Covered BY Subclasses C01d OR C01f 12

H01P - WAVEGUIDES; Resonators, Lines, OR Other Devices OF THE Waveguide Type 12

C01P - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Structural AND Physical Aspects OF Solid Inorganic Compounds 11

C04B - Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone 10

C08J - WORKING-UP; General Processes OF COMPOUNDING; After-treatment NOT Covered BY Subclasses C08b, C08c, C08f, C08g or C08h 9

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 9

C08L - Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds 9

B29K - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses B29b, B29c OR B29d, Relating TO Moulding Materials OR TO Materials FOR ; Moulds, ; Reinforcements, Fillers OR Preformed Parts, e.g. Inserts 7

Top 15 of 54 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Rogers Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Rogers Corporation's lead technology class is H01Q (Antennas, i.e. Radio Aerials), 45.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01Q
Ranked #3,782 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Rogers Corporation against Karma Automotive LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 66.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.