Where does Dana Italia S.R.L. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Dana Italia S.R.L. ranks #3,962 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Dana Italia S.R.L. hold?

Dana Italia S.R.L. holds 91 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2025, spanning 35 technology areas.

What is Dana Italia S.R.L.'s Innovation Score?

Dana Italia S.R.L. has an Innovation Score of 66.2 out of 100 (top 1% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Dana Italia S.R.L. focus on?

Dana Italia S.R.L.'s top technology area is F16H (Gearing) with 48 patents, ranking #85 of 1,603 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 35 CPC subclasses total.

Is Dana Italia S.R.L.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Dana Italia S.R.L.'s recent grant velocity is +1060% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Dana Italia S.R.L.'s patents?

Dana Italia S.R.L.'s patents average 16.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Dana Italia S.R.L. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Dana Italia S.R.L.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 91 granted patents across 35 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16H (Gearing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Dana ranks #3,962 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 91 patents across 35 technology areas.

#3,962
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 1%
by Innovation Score (66.2/100): 16.1
avg claims per patent: +1060%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R3962 · Foreign Corporation #3,962 · 91 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-STRONG · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 91 grants
TOP-DECILE #3,962/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Canoo
CPC-FOCUS F16H · 35 areas
INNOV-STRONG 66.2/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.1 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +1060% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Canoo Technologies Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Dana’s 66.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 15.6 pts (24%) Velocity 20.0 pts (30%) Breadth 20.9 pts (32%) Claim depth 9.6 pts (15%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Brose Fahrzeugteile… · near

66
Wuhan Tianma… · near

66
X Development · near

66
Dana Italia S R L · this assignee

66
Pacesetter · near

66
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Dana's Innovation Score is 66.2/100 (top 1% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Dana?

Each dot is one of Dana’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Dana’s own 16.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Dana vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Dana's grants concentrate

Dana Italia S.R.L. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 35 CPC subclasses with 52.7% of grants classified under F16H (Gearing). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (23 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2020. By volume, Dana sits between Canoo Technologies Inc. and Evalve, Inc..

Dana's three-year grant acceleration

Dana Italia S.R.L. shows 52 grants in 2022–2024 against only 11 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Canoo

91
Colopl

91
Crrc Qingdao Sifa…

91
Dainichiseika Col…

91
Dirtt Environment…

91
E G O Elektro-ger…

91
Esab AB

91
Evalve

91
Dana Italia S R L ◀

91

What this shows Dana holds 91 patents at rank #3,962, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Dana

By rank, the assignees closest to #3,962 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F16H (Gearing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Dana's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Dana, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In F16H (Gearing), Dana ranks #85 of 1,603 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (66 here).

Pacesetter, Inc. 66 Wuhan Tianma Microelectronics Co., Ltd. Shanghai Branch 66 X Development LLC 66 Brose Fahrzeugteile SE & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft, Bamberg 66

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (16.1 here).

Spts Technologies Limited 16.1 avg Wayne Fueling Systems LLC 16.1 avg WestRock Shared Services, LLC 16.1 avg Clearfield, Inc. 16.1 avg

Dana's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

66 Top 1% higher than 99% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Dana Italia S.R.L. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	5	5.5%
2020	2	2.2%
2021	4	4.4%
2022	13	14.3%
2023	16	17.6%
2024	23	25.3%
2025partial year	28	30.8%

Which technologies does Dana Italia S.R.L. patent most?

F16H - Gearing 48

B60K - Arrangement OR Mounting OF Propulsion Units OR OF Transmissions IN VEHICLES; Arrangement OR Mounting OF Plural Diverse Prime-movers IN VEHICLES; Auxiliary Drives FOR VEHICLES; Instrumentation OR Dashboards FOR VEHICLES; Arrangements IN Connection With Cooling, AIR Intake, GAS Exhaust OR Fuel Supply 24

B60W - Conjoint Control OF Vehicle Sub-units OF Different Type OR Different FUNCTION; Control Systems Specially Adapted FOR Hybrid VEHICLES; Road Vehicle Drive Control Systems FOR Purposes NOT Related TO THE Control OF A Particular Sub-unit 17

B62D - Motor VEHICLES; Trailers 11

F16D - Couplings FOR Transmitting ROTATION; CLUTCHES; Brakes 11

B60Y - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Aspects Cross-cutting Vehicle Technology 8

B60B - Vehicle Wheels ; CASTORS; Axles FOR Wheels OR CASTORS; Increasing Wheel Adhesion 7

B60C - Vehicle TYRES; Tyre INFLATION; Tyre CHANGING; Connecting Valves TO Inflatable Elastic Bodies IN GENERAL; Devices OR Arrangements Related TO Tyres 6

F16N - Lubricating 6

B60G - Vehicle Suspension Arrangements 5

E02F - DREDGING; Soil-shifting 5

Y02T - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Transportation 5

F16C - SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings 5

F15B - Systems Acting BY Means OF Fluids IN GENERAL; Fluid-pressure Actuators, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; Details OF Fluid-pressure Systems, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 3

B60T - Vehicle Brake Control Systems OR Parts THEREOF; Brake Control Systems OR Parts Thereof, IN General ; Arrangement OF Braking Elements ON Vehicles IN GENERAL; Portable Devices FOR Preventing Unwanted Movement OF VEHICLES; Vehicle Modifications TO Facilitate Cooling OF Brakes 3

Top 15 of 35 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Dana Italia S.R.L.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Dana Italia S.R.L.'s lead technology class is F16H (Gearing), 52.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16H
Ranked #3,962 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Dana Italia S.R.L. against Canoo Technologies Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 66.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.