Overall rank by patents
#4,353
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation
Research Development Foundation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record — 82 granted patents across 26 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: C07K (PEPTIDES).
82
Total patents granted
26
CPC technology areas
21.4
Avg claims per patent
-33%
5-year filing velocity
The verdict
Research holds 82 US patents across 26 technology areas — rank #4,353 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
- #4,353
- of 50,000 US assignees by volume
- Top 13%
- by Innovation Score (50.5/100)
- 21.4
- avg claims per patent
- -33%
- filing velocity, last 5 yrs
Portfolio overview
Research Development Foundation has been granted 82 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Research Development Foundation at rank #4,353 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 26 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 21.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in C07K (PEPTIDES). As a US Corporation, Research Development Foundation is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. The composite Innovation Score of 50.5/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 33 grants, compared with 49 in the 2015–2019 window — a -33% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Research Development Foundation's 21.4 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while a multi-domain presence across 26 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Research Development Foundation against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
How does Research compare?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus the largest corporate holders — this company marked ◀
- Samsung
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
106,890 patents
- International Bus…
International Business Machines Corporation
72,926 patents
- Canon 34,378
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
34,378 patents
- LG 32,607
LG ELECTRONICS INC.
32,607 patents
- Taiwan Semiconduc… 31,041
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LTD.
31,041 patents
- Apple 30,560
Apple Inc.
30,560 patents
- Qualcomm Incorpor… 30,354
QUALCOMM Incorporated
30,354 patents
- Intel 27,498
Intel Corporation
27,498 patents
- Research Developm… ◀ 82
Research Development Foundation
82 patents
What this shows Research holds 82 patents — placing it at rank #4,353 overall, well behind the volume leaders but ahead of the tens of thousands of smaller assignees in the dataset.
Research's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
50 Top 13% higher than 87% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView — PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 7 | 8.5% |
| 2016 | 12 | 14.6% |
| 2017 | 18 | 22.0% |
| 2018 | 4 | 4.9% |
| 2019 | 8 | 9.8% |
| 2020 | 5 | 6.1% |
| 2021 | 10 | 12.2% |
| 2022 | 5 | 6.1% |
| 2023 | 4 | 4.9% |
| 2024 | 6 | 7.3% |
| 2025 | 3 | 3.7% |
Which technologies does Research Development Foundation patent most?
Top 15 of 26 technology areas
Patent Moat Analysis
Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Multi-domain
Claim Depth Complex
Velocity Declining
Frequently Asked Questions
How many patents does Research Development Foundation hold?
Research Development Foundation holds 82 US granted patents filed between 2015 and 2025, spanning 26 technology areas.
What is Research Development Foundation's Innovation Score?
Research Development Foundation has an Innovation Score of 50.5 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Research Development Foundation focus on?
Research Development Foundation's top technology area is C07K (PEPTIDES) with 57 patents. The company has filed patents in 26 CPC subclasses total.
Is Research Development Foundation's patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Research Development Foundation's recent filing velocity is -33% compared to the prior five-year period. Filing activity has slowed relative to earlier years.
What does claim depth mean for Research Development Foundation's patents?
Research Development Foundation's patents average 21.4 claims each. This indicates complex, broadly scoped patents that are harder for competitors to design around.
How is the Research Development Foundation patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.
Learn More
How to use this portfolio
Research's 82 grants land it in the top 13% by Innovation Score — but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
- Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance — Research ranks #4,353 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
- Most of this portfolio concentrates in C07K — see who else leads that technology area. C07K leaders
- Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity — not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Explore the patent dataset
C07K technology
Research Development Foundation's primary CPC class — all holders and yearly trends
Top 50 patent holders
See where Research Development Foundation ranks among the largest US patent assignees
All technology classes
Browse every CPC technology area by patent activity
How the score works
The four dimensions behind the Innovation Score
Related
Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView — official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Data sources used on this page
- USPTO PatentsView — the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
- Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) — the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
- USPTO Patent Public Search — the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov
