Overall rank by patents
#25,069
of 50,000 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H05H (PLASMA TECHNIQUE ; PRODUCTION OF ACCELERATED ELECTRICALLY-CHARGED PARTICLES OR OF NEUTRONS; PRODUCTION OR ACCELERATION OF NEUTRAL MOLECULAR OR ATOMIC BEAMS).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Recarbon ranks #25,069 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 10 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R25069 · US Corporation #25,069 · 11 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: Railserve, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Zerotech (shenzhen)… · near
37 score
Actega DS · near
37 score
Neuroderm · near
37 score
Recarbon · this assignee
37 score
Tripwire · near
37 score
3D Lighting Innovati… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Recarbon's Innovation Score is 37.1/100 (top 45% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Recarbon, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 90.9% of grants classified under H05H (PLASMA TECHNIQUE ; PRODUCTION OF ACCELERATED ELECTRICALLY-CHARGED PARTICLES OR OF NEUTRONS; PRODUCTION OR ACCELERATION OF NEUTRAL MOLECULAR OR ATOMIC BEAMS). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Recarbon sits between Railserve, Inc. and Redberry Systems, Inc..
Recarbon, Inc. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Railserve, Inc.
11 patents
Rassini Suspensiones, S.A. de C.V.
11 patents
Ravdos Holdings, Inc.
11 patents
Rayner Intraocular Lenses Limited
11 patents
Reach Power, Inc.
11 patents
Realeyes OÜ
11 patents
Rectorseal, LLC
11 patents
Redberry Systems, Inc.
11 patents
ReCarbon, Inc.
11 patents
What this shows Recarbon holds 11 patents at rank #25,070, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #25,070 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Recarbon's primary technology class.
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Recarbon, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (37 here).
Recarbon's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
37 Top 45% higher than 55% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2016 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2017 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2020 | 4 | 36.4% |
| 2022 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2024 | 2 | 18.2% |
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#25,069
of 50,000 tracked assignees
37.1 out of 100
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.