Where does Redberry Systems, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Redberry Systems, Inc. ranks #25,071 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Redberry Systems, Inc. hold?

Redberry Systems, Inc. holds 11 US utility patents granted between 2018 and 2025, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Redberry Systems, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Redberry Systems, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 40.6 out of 100 (top 35% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Redberry Systems, Inc. focus on?

Redberry Systems, Inc.'s top technology area is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication) with 11 patents, ranking #2,214 of 8,956 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

Is Redberry Systems, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Redberry Systems, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +133% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Redberry Systems, Inc.'s patents?

Redberry Systems, Inc.'s patents average 24.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Redberry Systems, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Redberry Systems, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Redberry ranks #25,071 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 3 technology areas.

#25,071
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 35%
by Innovation Score (40.6/100): 24.7
avg claims per patent: +133%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R25071 · US Corporation #25,071 · 11 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
MID-PACK #25,071/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Reach Power
CPC-NARROW H04L · 3 areas
INNOV-PAR 40.6/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 24.7 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +133% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Reach Power, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Redberry’s 40.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.6 pts (21%) Velocity 11.1 pts (27%) Breadth 6.1 pts (15%) Claim depth 14.8 pts (36%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Redberry Systems · this assignee

41
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Redberry's Innovation Score is 40.6/100 (top 35% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Redberry?

Each dot is one of Redberry’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Redberry’s own 24.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Redberry vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Redberry's grants concentrate

Redberry Systems, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Redberry sits between ReCarbon, Inc. and Remediation Products, Inc..

Redberry's three-year grant acceleration

Redberry Systems, Inc. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Recarbon

11
Reach Power

11
Realeyes OÜ

11
Rectorseal

11
Redfin

11
Reel

11
Relationship Scie…

11
Remediation Produ…

11
Redberry Systems ◀

11

What this shows Redberry holds 11 patents at rank #25,074, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Redberry

By rank, the assignees closest to #25,074 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Redberry's primary technology class.

Redberry's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

41 Top 35% higher than 65% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Redberry Systems, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2018	2	18.2%
2019	1	9.1%
2020	1	9.1%
2021	1	9.1%
2022	2	18.2%
2023	2	18.2%
2024	1	9.1%
2025partial year	1	9.1%

Which technologies does Redberry Systems, Inc. patent most?

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 11

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 8

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 3

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Redberry Systems, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Redberry Systems, Inc.'s lead technology class is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04L
Ranked #25,071 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Redberry Systems, Inc. against ReCarbon, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 40.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.