Overall rank by patents
#2,134
of 49,997 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 185 granted patents across 94 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2023–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C22C (Alloys).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Proterial ranks #2,134 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 185 patents across 94 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R2134 · Foreign Corporation #2,134 · 185 grants
GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-STRONG · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
Nearest grant-volume peer: Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Festool · near
69 score
Angel · near
69 score
Vestas Wind Systems… · near
69 score
Zhejiang Geely… · near
69 score
Proterial · this assignee
69 score
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Proterial's Innovation Score is 68.9/100 (top 1% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Grant history spans 2023–2025. Across complete PatentsView years, output peaked in 2024 at 74 grants and bottomed in 2023 at 65. Lead class C22C accounts for 28.1% of the portfolio across 94 subclasses. Volume neighbours: Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited (#2,129) and Asics Corporation (#2,137).
Proterial, Ltd. shows 139 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited
185 patents
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology
185 patents
Ossur Iceland EHF
185 patents
PETRÓLEO Brasileiro S.A.—PETROBRAS
185 patents
PerkinElmer Health Sciences, Inc.
185 patents
Raytheon BBN Technologies Corp.
185 patents
ZEDEL
185 patents
Proterial, Ltd.
185 patents
Asics Corporation
184 patents
What this shows Proterial holds 185 patents at rank #2,133, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #2,133 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Proterial's primary technology class.
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Proterial, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (69 here).
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (9.7 here).
Proterial's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
69 Top 1% higher than 99% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2023–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 65 | 35.1% |
| 2024 | 74 | 40.0% |
| 2025partial year | 46 | 24.9% |
Top 15 of 94 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#2,134
of 49,997 tracked assignees
68.9 out of 100
What to do with this data
Proterial, Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.