Patent Category Corp.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63F (Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Patent ranks #42,254 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 9 technology areas.
- #42,254
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 18th percentile
- by Innovation Score (25.8/100)
- 14.2
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R42254 · US Corporation #42,254 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #42,254/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Park Plus
- CPC-NARROW A63F · 9 areas
- INNOV-THIN 25.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 14.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Park Plus, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Patent’s 25.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Patent
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Patent Category · this assignee 26
Patent Category · this assignee
26 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Patent's Innovation Score is 25.8/100 (18th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Patent?
Each dot is one of Patent’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Patent’s own 14.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 9.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Patent's grants concentrate
Patent Category Corp. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under A63F (Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Patent sits between Park Plus, Inc. and Payjoy Inc..
Who files at Patent's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Park Plus
Park Plus, Inc.
6 patents
- Parkling
Parkling GmbH
6 patents
- Particle Dynamics…
Particle Dynamics International, LLC.
6 patents
- Partners in Packa…
Partners in Packaging, LLC
6 patents
- Patent Innovations
Patent Innovations LLC
6 patents
- Pave
Pave, LLC
6 patents
- Paycasso Verify
Paycasso Verify Ltd
6 patents
- Payjoy
Payjoy Inc.
6 patents
- Patent Category ◀
Patent Category Corp.
6 patents
What this shows Patent holds 6 patents at rank #42,347, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Patent
By rank, the assignees closest to #42,347 in granted patent volume.
- Park Plus, Inc. #42,343 · 6 patents
- Parkling GmbH #42,344 · 6 patents
- Particle Dynamics International, LLC. #42,345 · 6 patents
- Partners in Packaging, LLC #42,346 · 6 patents
- Patent Innovations LLC #42,348 · 6 patents
- Pave, LLC #42,349 · 6 patents
- Paycasso Verify Ltd #42,350 · 6 patents
- Payjoy Inc. #42,351 · 6 patents
Leaders in A63F (Card)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Patent's primary technology class.
- Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc. 1,537 in class
- Nintendo Co., Ltd. 1,020 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 592 in class
- Tencent Technology (SHENZHEN) Company Limited 540 in class
- Gree Holdings, Inc. 446 in class
- Electronic Arts Inc. 422 in class
- Kabam, Inc. 325 in class
- Zynga Inc. 269 in class
Patent's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 18th percentile higher than 18% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 66.7% |
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Patent Category Corp. patent most?
Top 9 of 9 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Patent Category Corp.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Patent Category Corp.'s lead technology class is A63F (Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 33.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63F
- Ranked #42,254 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Patent Category Corp. against Park Plus, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 25.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.