PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Nanoco 2D Materials Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 19 technology areas, active 2020–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: C09K (MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE).

Explore the portfolio See the ranking
7
Total patents granted
19
CPC technology areas
12.9
Avg claims per patent
-
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Nanoco holds 7 US patents across 19 technology areas, rank #36,681 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#36,681
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 55%
by Innovation Score (33.6/100)
12.9
avg claims per patent

Portfolio overview

Nanoco 2D Materials Limited has been granted 7 US utility patents between 2020 and 2025, placing Nanoco 2D Materials Limited at rank #36,681 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 19 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 12.9 claims per patent with primary concentration in C09K (MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE). As a Foreign Corporation, Nanoco 2D Materials Limited is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Nanoco sits between Nano-product Engineering, Llc (7 patents, rank #36,677) and National Institute Of Immunology (7 patents, rank #36,685) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 33.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2020 through 2025, with 7 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Nanoco 2D Materials Limited's 12.9 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 19 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Nanoco 2D Materials Limited against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

Who files at Nanoco's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Nanoco holds 7 patents at rank #36,681, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Nanoco

By rank, the assignees closest to #36,681 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C09K (Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Nanoco's primary technology class.

Nanoco's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

34 Top 55% higher than 45% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). This entry sits in this band. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.533.5 2020202120242025 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Nanoco 2D Materials Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2020 1 14.3%
2021 3 42.9%
2024 2 28.6%
2025 1 14.3%

Which technologies does Nanoco 2D Materials Limited patent most?

Top 15 of 19 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Focused
Claim Depth Standard

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#36,681

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

33.6 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does Nanoco 2D Materials Limited hold?
Nanoco 2D Materials Limited holds 7 US granted patents filed between 2020 and 2025, spanning 19 technology areas.
What is Nanoco 2D Materials Limited's Innovation Score?
Nanoco 2D Materials Limited has an Innovation Score of 33.6 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Nanoco 2D Materials Limited focus on?
Nanoco 2D Materials Limited's top technology area is C09K (MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE) with 5 patents. The company has filed patents in 19 CPC subclasses total.
Is Nanoco 2D Materials Limited's patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Nanoco 2D Materials Limited.
What does claim depth mean for Nanoco 2D Materials Limited's patents?
Nanoco 2D Materials Limited's patents average 12.9 claims each. This falls within the standard range, providing solid legal coverage.
How is the Nanoco 2D Materials Limited patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Nanoco's 7 grants land it in the top 55% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Nanoco ranks #36,681 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in C09K - see who else leads that technology area. C09K leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.