Overall rank by patents
#36,679
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 10 technology areas, active 2018–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: C01B (NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; ; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C).
The verdict
Nanosynthesis holds 7 US patents across 10 technology areas, rank #36,679 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Nanosynthesis Plus, Ltd. has been granted 7 US utility patents between 2018 and 2024, placing Nanosynthesis Plus, Ltd. at rank #36,679 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 10 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 26.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in C01B (NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; ; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C). As a US Corporation, Nanosynthesis Plus, Ltd. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Nanosynthesis sits between Nakata Engineering Co., Ltd. (7 patents, rank #36,675) and Nanoscribe Holding Gmbh (7 patents, rank #36,683) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 46.7/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 6 grants, compared with 1 in the 2015–2019 window, a +500% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Nanosynthesis Plus, Ltd.'s 26.6 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while concentration in 10 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Nanosynthesis Plus, Ltd. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Nakata Engineering Co., Ltd.
7 patents
NandEXT S.R.L.
7 patents
Nano-Product Engineering, LLC
7 patents
NanoCytomics, LLC
7 patents
Nanoclear Technologies, Inc.
7 patents
Nanoco 2D Materials Limited
7 patents
Nanoscale Components, Inc.
7 patents
Nanoscribe Holding GmbH
7 patents
NanoSynthesis Plus, Ltd.
7 patents
What this shows Nanosynthesis holds 7 patents at rank #36,679, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,679 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Nanosynthesis's primary technology class.
Nanosynthesis's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
47 Top 20% higher than 80% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2021 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2022 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2023 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2024 | 1 | 14.3% |
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#36,679
Across all tracked assignees
46.7 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Nanosynthesis's 7 grants land it in the top 20% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.