Overall rank by patents
#4,728
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 74 granted patents across 23 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G01N (INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES).
The verdict
Molecular holds 74 US patents across 23 technology areas, rank #4,728 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Molecular Devices, Llc has been granted 74 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Molecular Devices, Llc at rank #4,728 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 23 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 18.3 claims per patent with primary concentration in G01N (INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES). As a US Corporation, Molecular Devices, Llc is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Molecular sits between Kaohsiung Medical University (74 patents, rank #4,724) and Pierburg Gmbh (74 patents, rank #4,732) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 48.4/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 39 grants, compared with 35 in the 2015–2019 window, a +11% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Molecular Devices, Llc's 18.3 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 23 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Molecular Devices, Llc against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
74 patents
Keystone Retaining Wall Systems, LLC
74 patents
Luigi Lavazza S.p.A.
74 patents
Magnolia Medical Technologies, Inc.
74 patents
Nanning FuLian FuGui Precision Industrial Co., Ltd.
74 patents
NcStar, Inc.
74 patents
PHYSIK INSTRUMENTE (PI) GMBH & CO. KG
74 patents
PIERBURG GMBH
74 patents
Molecular Devices, LLC
74 patents
What this shows Molecular holds 74 patents at rank #4,728, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #4,728 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Molecular's primary technology class.
Molecular's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
48 Top 17% higher than 83% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 10 | 13.5% |
| 2016 | 3 | 4.1% |
| 2017 | 6 | 8.1% |
| 2018 | 11 | 14.9% |
| 2019 | 5 | 6.8% |
| 2020 | 8 | 10.8% |
| 2021 | 10 | 13.5% |
| 2022 | 5 | 6.8% |
| 2023 | 7 | 9.5% |
| 2024 | 7 | 9.5% |
| 2025 | 2 | 2.7% |
Top 15 of 23 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#4,728
Across all tracked assignees
48.4 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Molecular's 74 grants land it in the top 17% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.