Marshall Electric Corp.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F02P (Ignition, Other Than Compression Ignition, FOR Internal-combustion ENGINES; Testing OF Ignition Timing IN Compression-ignition Engines).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Marshall ranks #32,431 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #32,431
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 15th percentile
- by Innovation Score (24.4/100)
- 14.9
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R32431 · US Corporation #32,431 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #32,431/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH MANN+HUMMEL…
- CPC-NARROW F02P · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 24.4/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 14.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: MANN+HUMMEL Purolator Filters LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Marshall’s 24.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Marshall
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Marshall Electric · this assignee 24
Marshall Electric · this assignee
24 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Marshall's Innovation Score is 24.4/100 (15th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Marshall?
Each dot is one of Marshall’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Marshall’s own 14.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Marshall's grants concentrate
Marshall Electric Corp. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 75% of grants classified under F02P (Ignition, Other Than Compression Ignition, FOR Internal-combustion ENGINES; Testing OF Ignition Timing IN Compression-ignition Engines). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Marshall sits between MANN+HUMMEL Purolator Filters LLC and Mate GmbH.
Who files at Marshall's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- MANN+Hummel Purol…
MANN+HUMMEL Purolator Filters LLC
8 patents
- Mannington Mills
Mannington Mills, Inc.
8 patents
- Marantec Antriebs…
Marantec Antriebs-und Steuerungstechnik GMBH & Co. KG
8 patents
- Maritime Telecomm…
Maritime Telecommunications Network Inc.
8 patents
- Maruo Calcium
Maruo Calcium Co., Ltd.
8 patents
- Marvis Interventi…
Marvis Interventional GMBH
8 patents
- Maschinenfabrik K…
Maschinenfabrik Koeppern GMBH & Co. KG
8 patents
- Mate
Mate GmbH
8 patents
- Marshall Electric ◀
Marshall Electric Corp.
8 patents
What this shows Marshall holds 8 patents at rank #32,404, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Marshall
By rank, the assignees closest to #32,404 in granted patent volume.
- MANN+HUMMEL Purolator Filters LLC #32,400 · 8 patents
- Mannington Mills, Inc. #32,401 · 8 patents
- Marantec Antriebs-und Steuerungstechnik GMBH & Co. KG #32,402 · 8 patents
- Maritime Telecommunications Network Inc. #32,403 · 8 patents
- Maruo Calcium Co., Ltd. #32,405 · 8 patents
- Marvis Interventional GMBH #32,406 · 8 patents
- Maschinenfabrik Koeppern GMBH & Co. KG #32,407 · 8 patents
- Mate GmbH #32,408 · 8 patents
Leaders in F02P (Ignition)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Marshall's primary technology class.
Marshall's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
24 15th percentile higher than 15% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2018 | 6 | 75.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 12.5% |
Which technologies does Marshall Electric Corp. patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Marshall Electric Corp.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Marshall Electric Corp.'s lead technology class is F02P (Ignition, Other Than Compression Ignition, FOR Internal-combustion ENGINES; Testing OF Ignition Timing IN Compression-ignition Engines), 75% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F02P
- Ranked #32,431 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Marshall Electric Corp. against MANN+HUMMEL Purolator Filters LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 24.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.