Mate GmbH
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E04D (Roof COVERINGS; SKY-LIGHTS; GUTTERS; Roof-working Tools).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Mate ranks #32,437 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 10 technology areas.
- #32,437
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 36%
- by Innovation Score (40.4/100)
- 26.3
- avg claims per patent
- -83%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R32437 · Foreign Corporation #32,437 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #32,437/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Marshall Electric
- CPC-FOCUS E04D · 10 areas
- INNOV-PAR 40.4/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 26.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -83% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Marshall Electric Corp. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Mate’s 40.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Mate
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Mate · this assignee
Mate · this assignee
40 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Mate's Innovation Score is 40.4/100 (top 36% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Mate?
Each dot is one of Mate’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Mate’s own 26.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Mate's grants concentrate
Mate GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 75% of grants classified under E04D (Roof COVERINGS; SKY-LIGHTS; GUTTERS; Roof-working Tools). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Mate sits between Marshall Electric Corp. and Maxst Co., Ltd..
Mate's three-year grant acceleration
Mate GmbH shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Mate's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Marshall Electric
Marshall Electric Corp.
8 patents
- Maruo Calcium
Maruo Calcium Co., Ltd.
8 patents
- Marvis Interventi…
Marvis Interventional GMBH
8 patents
- Maschinenfabrik K…
Maschinenfabrik Koeppern GMBH & Co. KG
8 patents
- Material Girl
Material Girl Inc
8 patents
- Matsui MFG
Matsui MFG. Co., Ltd.
8 patents
- Maxio Technology…
Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd.
8 patents
- Maxst
Maxst Co., Ltd.
8 patents
- Mate ◀
Mate GmbH
8 patents
What this shows Mate holds 8 patents at rank #32,408, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Mate
By rank, the assignees closest to #32,408 in granted patent volume.
- Marshall Electric Corp. #32,404 · 8 patents
- Maruo Calcium Co., Ltd. #32,405 · 8 patents
- Marvis Interventional GMBH #32,406 · 8 patents
- Maschinenfabrik Koeppern GMBH & Co. KG #32,407 · 8 patents
- Material Girl Inc #32,409 · 8 patents
- Matsui MFG. Co., Ltd. #32,410 · 8 patents
- Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. #32,411 · 8 patents
- Maxst Co., Ltd. #32,412 · 8 patents
Leaders in E04D (Roof Coverings)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Mate's primary technology class.
Mate's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
40 Top 36% higher than 64% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2016 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2017 | 3 | 37.5% |
| 2019 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2022 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 12.5% |
Which technologies does Mate GmbH patent most?
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Mate GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Mate GmbH's lead technology class is E04D (Roof COVERINGS; SKY-LIGHTS; GUTTERS; Roof-working Tools), 75% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E04D
- Ranked #32,437 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Mate GmbH against Marshall Electric Corp., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 40.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.