Leatt Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 16 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A42B (HATS; Head Coverings).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Leatt ranks #17,842 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 16 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #17,842
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 46%
- by Innovation Score (36.6/100)
- 5.2
- avg claims per patent
- +550%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R17842 · US Corporation #17,842 · 16 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 16 grants
- MID-PACK #17,842/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Larc Networks
- CPC-NARROW A42B · 6 areas
- INNOV-THIN 36.6/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 5.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +550% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Larc Networks, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Leatt’s 36.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Leatt
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Leatt · this assignee
Leatt · this assignee
37 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Leatt's Innovation Score is 36.6/100 (top 46% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Leatt?
Each dot is one of Leatt’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Leatt’s own 5.2 claims/patent is at or below the 7.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Leatt's grants concentrate
Leatt Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 31.3% of grants classified under A42B (HATS; Head Coverings). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Leatt sits between L'Garde, Inc. and Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd..
Leatt's three-year grant acceleration
Leatt Corporation shows 9 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Leatt's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- L'garde
L'Garde, Inc.
16 patents
- Larc Networks
Larc Networks, Inc.
16 patents
- Laurel Bank Machi…
Laurel Bank Machines Co., Ltd.
16 patents
- Lazzeri Societa A…
Lazzeri Societa Agricola a.r.i.
16 patents
- Leistritz Pumpen
Leistritz Pumpen GMBH
16 patents
- Leonardo MW
Leonardo MW Ltd.
16 patents
- Liffe Administrat…
Liffe Administration and Management
16 patents
- Limoss (Shenzhen)
Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd.
16 patents
- Leatt ◀
Leatt Corporation
16 patents
What this shows Leatt holds 16 patents at rank #17,838, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Leatt
By rank, the assignees closest to #17,838 in granted patent volume.
- L'Garde, Inc. #17,834 · 16 patents
- Larc Networks, Inc. #17,835 · 16 patents
- Laurel Bank Machines Co., Ltd. #17,836 · 16 patents
- Lazzeri Societa Agricola a.r.i. #17,837 · 16 patents
- Leistritz Pumpen GMBH #17,839 · 16 patents
- Leonardo MW Ltd. #17,840 · 16 patents
- Liffe Administration and Management #17,841 · 16 patents
- Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd. #17,842 · 16 patents
Leaders in A42B (HATS)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Leatt's primary technology class.
Leatt's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
37 Top 46% higher than 54% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 6.3% |
| 2017 | 1 | 6.3% |
| 2021 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 2022 | 3 | 18.8% |
| 2023 | 1 | 6.3% |
| 2024 | 5 | 31.3% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 6.3% |
Which technologies does Leatt Corporation patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Leatt Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Leatt Corporation's lead technology class is A42B (HATS; Head Coverings), 31.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A42B
- Ranked #17,842 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Leatt Corporation against L'Garde, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 36.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.