Where does Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd. ranks #17,851 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd. hold?

Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd. holds 16 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2021, spanning 11 technology areas.

What is Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 26.2 out of 100 (20th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd. focus on?

Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd.'s top technology area is F16H (Gearing) with 3 patents, ranking #569 of 1,603 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 11 CPC subclasses total.

Is Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is -86% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd.'s patents?

Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd.'s patents average 7.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 16 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16H (Gearing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Limoss ranks #17,851 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 16 patents across 11 technology areas.

#17,851
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 20th percentile
by Innovation Score (26.2/100): 7.9
avg claims per patent: -86%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R17851 · Foreign Corporation #17,851 · 16 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 16 grants
MID-PACK #17,851/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Leatt
CPC-FOCUS F16H · 11 areas
INNOV-THIN 26.2/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 7.9 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -86% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Leatt Corporation (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Limoss’s 26.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.8 pts (37%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 11.7 pts (45%) Claim depth 4.7 pts (18%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Limoss (SHENZHEN) · this assignee

26
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Limoss's Innovation Score is 26.2/100 (20th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Limoss?

Each dot is one of Limoss’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Limoss’s own 7.9 claims/patent is at or below the 14.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Limoss vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Limoss's grants concentrate

Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 18.8% of grants classified under F16H (Gearing). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Limoss sits between Leatt Corporation and Locus Energy, Inc..

Leatt

16
Leistritz Pumpen

16
Leonardo MW

16
Liffe Administrat…

16
Liquidia

16
Llevinac S L

16
LO3 Energy

16
Locus Energy

16
Limoss (Shenzhen) ◀

16

What this shows Limoss holds 16 patents at rank #17,842, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Limoss

By rank, the assignees closest to #17,842 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F16H (Gearing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Limoss's primary technology class.

Limoss's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

26 20th percentile higher than 20% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	12.5%
2016	1	6.3%
2017	5	31.3%
2018	1	6.3%
2019	5	31.3%
2020	1	6.3%
2021	1	6.3%

Which technologies does Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd. patent most?

F16H - Gearing 3

H01R - Electrically-conductive CONNECTIONS; Structural Associations OF A Plurality OF Mutually-insulated Electrical Connecting ELEMENTS; Coupling DEVICES; Current Collectors 2

H02K - Dynamo-electric Machines 2

G09B - Educational OR Demonstration APPLIANCES; Appliances FOR Teaching, OR Communicating With, THE Blind, Deaf OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; Diagrams 1

G08C - Transmission Systems FOR Measured Values, Control OR Similar Signals 1

G05G - Control Devices OR Systems Insofar AS Characterised BY Mechanical Features Only 1

F16M - Frames, Casings OR Beds OF Engines, Machines OR Apparatus, NOT Specific TO Engines, Machines OR Apparatus Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; STANDS; Supports 1

A47C - CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds 1

H05K - Printed CIRCUITS; Casings OR Constructional Details OF Electric APPARATUS; Manufacture OF Assemblages OF Electrical Components 1

H02J - Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy 1

B60N - Seats Specially Adapted FOR VEHICLES; Vehicle Passenger Accommodation NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

Top 11 of 11 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is F16H (Gearing), 18.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16H
Ranked #17,851 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Limoss (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd. against Leatt Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 26.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.