CPC technology class · A41
A41F - Garment Fastenings
Garment fastenings; suspenders. 683 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year filing trajectory.
- 683
- US patents granted
- A41
- Parent CPC class
- 20
- Active assignees
- +26%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
Garment Fastenings ranks #505 of 670 CPC technology areas - 683 US patents granted since 2015, with filing up 26% over five years.
- #505
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 683
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Nike
- leading assignee (93)
- +26%
- filing velocity, last 5 yrs
CPC subclass A41F - GARMENT FASTENINGS; SUSPENDERS - covers 683 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025 according to USPTO PatentsView records, within the broader CPC class A41 (WEARING APPAREL). See our CPC classification guide for how the system works.
The competitive landscape in A41F is shaped by 20 distinct companies actively filing in this space. NIKE, Inc. leads with 93 patents, followed by Dubrosky & Tracy Patent Service Corp. at 13 grants and Boa Technology Inc. at 11.
Filing activity in A41F is up 26% over the past five years versus 2015-2019, a sharp acceleration suggesting an emerging or fast-moving technology area. All counts come directly from USPTO PatentsView and reflect US granted utility patents only.
Is A41F innovation accelerating?
US utility-patent grants per year in A41F, 2015–2025 - recent five years are up 26% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads A41F?
The 12 most active assignees in GARMENT FASTENINGS; SUSPENDERS - wider bars mean more grants
- Talon
Talon Technologies, Inc.
14 patents
- Dubrosky & Tracy Pate…
DUBROSKY & TRACY PATENT SERVICE CORP.
13 patents
- Boa Technology
Boa Technology Inc.
11 patents
- Fidlock
FIDLOCK GMBH
9 patents
- Lululemon Athletica C…
Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.
7 patents
- Hbi Branded Apparel E…
HBI BRANDED APPAREL ENTERPRISES, LLC
7 patents
- Spanx
Spanx, LLC
7 patents
- Amer Sports Canada
Amer Sports Canada Inc.
6 patents
- The Gap 5
The Gap, Inc.
5 patents
- Team Nexbelt Operating 5
TEAM NexBelt Operating, Inc.
5 patents
- Ossur Iceland Ehf 4
OSSUR ICELAND EHF
4 patents
- Outdoor Edge Cutlery 4
OUTDOOR EDGE CUTLERY, LLC
4 patents
What this shows Nike is the most active filer in A41F, holding 93 of the 683 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in A41F |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Talon Technologies, Inc. | 14 |
| #2 | Dubrosky & Tracy Patent Service Corp. | 13 |
| #3 | Boa Technology Inc. | 11 |
| #4 | Fidlock Gmbh | 9 |
| #5 | Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. | 7 |
| #6 | HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises, Llc | 7 |
| #7 | Spanx, Llc | 7 |
| #8 | Amer Sports Canada Inc. | 6 |
| #9 | The Gap, Inc. | 5 |
| #10 | TEAM Nexbelt Operating, Inc. | 5 |
| #11 | Ossur Iceland EHF | 4 |
| #12 | Outdoor EDGE Cutlery, Llc | 4 |
| #13 | TIDI Products, Llc | 4 |
| #14 | S&S Precision, Llc | 4 |
| #15 | TYR Tactical, Llc | 4 |
| #16 | Blanqi, Llc | 4 |
| #17 | KORE Essentials Inc. | 4 |
| #18 | Slidebelts Inc. | 4 |
| #19 | Boston Inventions, Llc | 4 |
| #20 | Lucida, Llc | 4 |
About This Class
CPC subclass A41F belongs to class A41.
683 patents were granted in this class between 2015 and 2025.
20 companies actively patent in this space.
Classification System
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) is a hierarchical patent classification system used by the USPTO and EPO.
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading A41F assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Top 14 A41F assignees by class footprint. Bubble size = patents in A41F. Source: USPTO PatentsView (claim depth is company-wide across all classes).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CPC class A41F?
How many patents have been filed in A41F?
Which company holds the most patents in A41F?
How is patent data for A41F collected?
What is the difference between CPC class and subclass?
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.