Lab2Fab LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B67D (Dispensing, Delivering OR Transferring Liquids, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Lab2fab ranks #32,298 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 12 technology areas.
- #32,298
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 8%
- by Innovation Score (54.4/100)
- 24.3
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R32298 · US Corporation #32,298 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #32,298/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Laboratoire M2
- CPC-FOCUS B67D · 12 areas
- INNOV-PAR 54.4/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 24.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2022–2025 · 4y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Laboratoire M2 (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Lab2fab’s 54.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Lab2fab
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Lab2Fab · this assignee
Lab2Fab · this assignee
54 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Lab2fab's Innovation Score is 54.4/100 (top 8% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Lab2fab?
Each dot is one of Lab2fab’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Lab2fab’s own 24.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Lab2fab's grants concentrate
Lab2Fab LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 62.5% of grants classified under B67D (Dispensing, Delivering OR Transferring Liquids, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, Lab2fab sits between Lyndra Therapeutics, Inc. and Laird Dabendorf GmbH.
Lab2fab's three-year grant acceleration
Lab2Fab LLC shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Lab2Fab's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Lyndra Therapeuti…
Lyndra Therapeutics, Inc.
8 patents
- Lysse Partners
Lysse Partners LLC
8 patents
- Lysulin
Lysulin, Inc.
8 patents
- Lyteloop
Lyteloop Technologies, LLC
8 patents
- Laboratoire M2
Laboratoire M2
8 patents
- Labrys Biologics
Labrys Biologics, Inc.
8 patents
- Lahey Clinic
Lahey Clinic, Inc.
8 patents
- Laird Dabendorf
Laird Dabendorf GmbH
8 patents
- Lab2fab ◀
Lab2Fab LLC
8 patents
What this shows Lab2Fab holds 8 patents at rank #32,335, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Lab2Fab
By rank, the assignees closest to #32,335 in granted patent volume.
- Lyndra Therapeutics, Inc. #32,331 · 8 patents
- Lysse Partners LLC #32,332 · 8 patents
- Lysulin, Inc. #32,333 · 8 patents
- Lyteloop Technologies, LLC #32,334 · 8 patents
- Laboratoire M2 #32,336 · 8 patents
- Labrys Biologics, Inc. #32,337 · 8 patents
- Lahey Clinic, Inc. #32,338 · 8 patents
- Laird Dabendorf GmbH #32,339 · 8 patents
Leaders in B67D (Dispensing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Lab2Fab's primary technology class.
Lab2fab's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
54 Top 8% higher than 92% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2023 | 3 | 37.5% |
| 2024 | 3 | 37.5% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 12.5% |
Which technologies does Lab2Fab LLC patent most?
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Lab2Fab LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Lab2Fab LLC's lead technology class is B67D (Dispensing, Delivering OR Transferring Liquids, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 62.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B67D
- Ranked #32,298 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Lab2Fab LLC against Lyndra Therapeutics, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 54.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.