Where does Lahey Clinic, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Lahey Clinic, Inc. ranks #32,303 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Lahey Clinic, Inc. hold?

Lahey Clinic, Inc. holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2025, spanning 6 technology areas.

What is Lahey Clinic, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Lahey Clinic, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 48.9 out of 100 (top 16% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Lahey Clinic, Inc. focus on?

Lahey Clinic, Inc.'s top technology area is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification) with 6 patents, ranking #2,680 of 7,127 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 6 CPC subclasses total.

Is Lahey Clinic, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Lahey Clinic, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +33% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Lahey Clinic, Inc.'s patents?

Lahey Clinic, Inc.'s patents average 21.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Lahey Clinic, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Lahey Clinic, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Lahey ranks #32,303 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 6 technology areas.

#32,303
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 16%
by Innovation Score (48.9/100): 21.0
avg claims per patent: +33%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R32303 · US Corporation #32,303 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #32,303/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Lab2Fab
CPC-NARROW A61B · 6 areas
INNOV-PAR 48.9/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 21.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-UP +33% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Lab2Fab LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Lahey’s 48.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.6 pts (16%) Velocity 20.0 pts (41%) Breadth 8.7 pts (18%) Claim depth 12.6 pts (26%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Lahey Clinic · this assignee

49
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Lahey's Innovation Score is 48.9/100 (top 16% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Lahey?

Each dot is one of Lahey’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Lahey’s own 21.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Lahey vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Lahey's grants concentrate

Lahey Clinic, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 75% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Lahey sits between Lyteloop Technologies, LLC and Laxxon Medical AG.

Lahey's three-year grant acceleration

Lahey Clinic, Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Lyteloop

8
Lab2fab

8
Laboratoire M2

8
Labrys Biologics

8
Laird Dabendorf

8
Landmark Screens

8
Lanzatech NZ

8
Laxxon Medical

8
Lahey Clinic ◀

8

What this shows Lahey holds 8 patents at rank #32,338, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Lahey

By rank, the assignees closest to #32,338 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Lahey's primary technology class.

Lahey's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

49 Top 16% higher than 84% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Lahey Clinic, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	1	12.5%
2018	2	25.0%
2021	1	12.5%
2023	1	12.5%
2024	2	25.0%
2025partial year	1	12.5%

Which technologies does Lahey Clinic, Inc. patent most?

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 6

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 4

G16H - Healthcare Informatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR THE Handling OR Processing OF Medical OR Healthcare Data 4

C12Q - Measuring OR Testing Processes Involving Enzymes, Nucleic Acids OR Microorganisms ; Compositions OR Test Papers THEREFOR; Processes OF Preparing Such COMPOSITIONS; Condition-responsive Control IN Microbiological OR Enzymological Processes 2

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 2

G02B - Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus 1

Top 6 of 6 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Lahey Clinic, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Lahey Clinic, Inc.'s lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 75% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
Ranked #32,303 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Lahey Clinic, Inc. against Lyteloop Technologies, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 48.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.