Lyteloop Technologies, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Lyteloop ranks #32,396 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 12 technology areas.
- #32,396
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 33%
- by Innovation Score (41.5/100)
- 43.6
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R32396 · US Corporation #32,396 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #32,396/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Lab2Fab
- CPC-FOCUS G02B · 12 areas
- INNOV-PAR 41.5/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 43.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2020–2022 · 3y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Lab2Fab LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Lyteloop’s 41.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Lyteloop
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Lyteloop · this assignee
Lyteloop · this assignee
42 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Lyteloop's Innovation Score is 41.5/100 (top 33% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Lyteloop?
Each dot is one of Lyteloop’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Lyteloop’s own 43.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 18.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Lyteloop's grants concentrate
Lyteloop Technologies, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 75% of grants classified under G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (4 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2020. By volume, Lyteloop sits between LXS, LLC and Lahey Clinic, Inc..
Lyteloop's three-year grant acceleration
Lyteloop Technologies, LLC shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Lyteloop's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- LXS
LXS, LLC
8 patents
- Lyndra Therapeuti…
Lyndra Therapeutics, Inc.
8 patents
- Lysse Partners
Lysse Partners LLC
8 patents
- Lysulin
Lysulin, Inc.
8 patents
- Lab2fab
Lab2Fab LLC
8 patents
- Laboratoire M2
Laboratoire M2
8 patents
- Labrys Biologics
Labrys Biologics, Inc.
8 patents
- Lahey Clinic
Lahey Clinic, Inc.
8 patents
- Lyteloop ◀
Lyteloop Technologies, LLC
8 patents
What this shows Lyteloop holds 8 patents at rank #32,334, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Lyteloop
By rank, the assignees closest to #32,334 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in G02B (Optical Elements)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Lyteloop's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4,608 in class
- Canon Kabushiki Kaisha 2,525 in class
- Fujifilm Corporation 2,173 in class
- BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. 1,899 in class
- Olympus Corporation 1,893 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 1,572 in class
- Apple Inc. 1,367 in class
- Seiko Epson Corporation 1,332 in class
Lyteloop's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
42 Top 33% higher than 67% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2021 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2022 | 4 | 50.0% |
Which technologies does Lyteloop Technologies, LLC patent most?
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Lyteloop Technologies, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Lyteloop Technologies, LLC's lead technology class is G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus), 75% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G02B
- Ranked #32,396 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Lyteloop Technologies, LLC against LXS, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 41.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.