Kopter Group AG
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 13 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B64C (AEROPLANES; Helicopters).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Kopter ranks #21,352 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 13 technology areas.
- #21,352
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 46th percentile
- by Innovation Score (33.9/100)
- 12.7
- avg claims per patent
- +350%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R21352 · Foreign Corporation #21,352 · 13 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
- MID-PACK #21,352/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Kiro Grifols S L
- CPC-FOCUS B64C · 13 areas
- INNOV-THIN 33.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 12.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +350% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Kiro Grifols, S.L. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Kopter’s 33.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Kopter
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Kopter Group · this assignee 34
Kopter Group · this assignee
34 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Kopter's Innovation Score is 33.9/100 (46th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Kopter?
Each dot is one of Kopter’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Kopter’s own 12.7 claims/patent is at or below the 14.5 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Kopter's grants concentrate
Kopter Group AG is a focused PatentsView assignee: 13 CPC subclasses with 92.3% of grants classified under B64C (AEROPLANES; Helicopters). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Kopter sits between Kiro Grifols, S.L. and L&K Biomed Co., Ltd..
Kopter's three-year grant acceleration
Kopter Group AG shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Kopter's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Kiro Grifols S L
Kiro Grifols, S.L.
13 patents
- Kiwico
KiwiCo, Inc.
13 patents
- Klipsch Group
Klipsch Group, Inc.
13 patents
- Kolo
Kolo Technologies, Inc.
13 patents
- Kornit Digital
Kornit Digital Technologies Ltd.
13 patents
- Korsch
Korsch AG
13 patents
- Kuhn-geldrop B V
Kuhn-Geldrop B.V.
13 patents
- L&K Biomed
L&K Biomed Co., Ltd.
13 patents
- Kopter Group ◀
Kopter Group AG
13 patents
What this shows Kopter holds 13 patents at rank #21,354, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Kopter
By rank, the assignees closest to #21,354 in granted patent volume.
- Kiro Grifols, S.L. #21,350 · 13 patents
- KiwiCo, Inc. #21,351 · 13 patents
- Klipsch Group, Inc. #21,352 · 13 patents
- Kolo Technologies, Inc. #21,353 · 13 patents
- Kornit Digital Technologies Ltd. #21,355 · 13 patents
- Korsch AG #21,356 · 13 patents
- Kuhn-Geldrop B.V. #21,357 · 13 patents
- L&K Biomed Co., Ltd. #21,358 · 13 patents
Leaders in B64C (Aeroplanes)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Kopter's primary technology class.
Kopter's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
34 46th percentile higher than 46% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 7.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 7.7% |
| 2020 | 3 | 23.1% |
| 2021 | 2 | 15.4% |
| 2024 | 4 | 30.8% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 15.4% |
Which technologies does Kopter Group AG patent most?
Top 13 of 13 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Kopter Group AG's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Kopter Group AG's lead technology class is B64C (AEROPLANES; Helicopters), 92.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B64C
- Ranked #21,352 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Kopter Group AG against Kiro Grifols, S.L., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 33.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.